<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018</id><updated>2011-04-22T05:55:14.208+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Loose Wire</title><subtitle type='html'>musings, snippets, grievances and links on personal technology by dow jones columnist jeremy wagstaff.</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default?max-results=100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default?start-index=101&amp;max-results=100'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>529</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>100</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107334934195140860</id><published>2004-01-06T07:35:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2004-01-06T07:39:16.153+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Move Along Now Please! Nothing To See Here</title><content type='html'>Folks, another year, and this website is now &lt;a href="http://loosewireblog.com" target="_blank"&gt;officially moved&lt;/a&gt;. Please come visit. Same content, same bloke blathering on. The only downside: For now no email subscriptions. Maybe now is the time to take the plunge into RSS?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107334934195140860?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107334934195140860'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107334934195140860'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2004_01_04_archive.html#107334934195140860' title='Move Along Now Please! Nothing To See Here'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107283179256295126</id><published>2003-12-31T07:49:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-31T07:50:57.890+07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Way Forward For RSS Content</title><content type='html'>RSS is one of those technologies that's hard to explain to casual users of the Internet. When you tell them they can have their news and site updates in the form of a feed, direct to their desktop, they usually ask &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a) can't I do that already? I thought I could do that already.&lt;br /&gt;b) you mean like email? I don't want more programs on my computer. Or &lt;br /&gt;c) OK, sounds good but what kind of things can I get? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't get me wrong. RSS, or something like it, is the future. But it's a hard sell to folk who haven't downloaded a program in their life (more people than you're care to imagine; I wonder what the stats on that look like), or to folk who are so worn out by spam they don't want to sift through more bits and pieces arriving on the computer. But even if people do like the sound of it, RSS still doesn't lend itself to grabbing information. It's great for folks looking to read what other people are writing, or even keeping up to speed on general news, but it doesn't quite have the customisation necessary to lure ordinary folk. Not everyone considers reading blogs in another format to be their idea of fun. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This may be changing (not the idea of fun, the customisation of RSS.) Klips, an RSS-type desktop feed from &lt;a href="http://www.serence.com/site.php" target="_blank"&gt;Serence&lt;/a&gt;, have introduced modules that include feeds of more specific, user-defined data, allowing you to track selected &lt;a href="http://www.klipfarm.com/farm.php?page=info&amp;klip=1492" target="_blank"&gt;currencies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.klipfarm.com/farm.php?page=info&amp;klip=1014" target="_blank"&gt;UPS and FedEx packages&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.klipfarm.com/farm.php?page=info&amp;klip=958" target="_blank"&gt;stocks&lt;/a&gt;. (While I love the design and simplicity of Klips, I don't think they work for large bodies of information, such as blogs and news, so expect to see Klips move more and more in the direction of small clumps of changing data, such as traffic reports, flight departure and arrival times, or hot deals, scattered around your desktop.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;RSS could do a lot of this too, but so far hasn't. You can harvest a lot of information via RSS but most of it is passive: You can't tailor it too much. Either take the feed or don't. This will change, and already is beginning to, thanks in part to a guy called &lt;a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0100875/" target="_blank"&gt;Mikel Maron&lt;/a&gt; from the University of Sussex. &lt;a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0100875/2003/12/27.html#a1045" target="_blank"&gt;He's come up with a way&lt;/a&gt; to deliver some of the personalized data from your &lt;a href="http://my.yahoo.com/" target="_blank"&gt;My Yahoo!&lt;/a&gt; account to an RSS feed, a neat trick that arose from his university studies. (If you're interested in the technical aspects, &lt;a href="http://brainoff.com/myy2rss/report.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;here they are in PDF form&lt;/a&gt;.) So far his feed -- which is not related to Yahoo! in any way -- can handle market quotes, weather and movie listing, depending on how you've configured your Yahoo! account. But of course his approach offers great potential for funnelling all sorts of personalized data straight to your RSS browser. Let's hope Yahoo! support, or even buy, Mikel's efforts. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Thanks to &lt;a href="http://rss.lockergnome.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Chris Pirillo's LockerGnome RSS Resource&lt;/a&gt; for pointing out Mikel's site.)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107283179256295126?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107283179256295126'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107283179256295126'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_28_archive.html#107283179256295126' title='A Way Forward For RSS Content'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107276832438298440</id><published>2003-12-30T14:12:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-30T14:13:09.310+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Goodbye To The Browser?</title><content type='html'>Here's some more interesting end-of-year stuff from Nielsen//NetRatings: a &lt;a href="http://www.netratings.com/pr/pr_031230_us.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;report issued today&lt;/a&gt; (PDF file) says that three out of every four home and work Internet users access the Internet using a non-browser based Internet application, particularly media players, instant messengers and file sharing applications. &amp;#8220;With 76 percent of Web surfers using Internet applications, functionality has grown beyond the browser to become a fundamental piece of the overall desktop,&amp;#8221; said Abha Bhagat, senior analyst Nielsen//NetRatings. &amp;#8220;It's become harder to distinguish when you're on the Internet, blurring the lines between what's sitting on the desktop and what's coming from the World Wide Web.&amp;#8221;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the report, the top five applications are Windows Media Player, AOL Instant Messenger, Yahoo! Messenger, MSN Messenger Service and Real Player. Of these top five applications, Windows Media has the largest active user reach at 34 percent. AOL Instant Messenger was next at 20 percent, followed by Real Player also at 20 percent, MSN Messenger Service at 19 percent and Yahoo! Messenger  Service, which reaches 12 percent of the active user base.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Interesting. But what does it actually tell us? First off, we shouldn't get confused by the data. This doesn't mean that folks are eschewing the browser, just that a lot of other programs are also connecting to the Internet (where is e-mail in all this?). Second, if Real Networks and MSN Messenger are anything to go by, a lot of these programs access the Internet without the user doing anything (or even knowing about it) so does this actually count? Lastly, there's been plenty written already about how Microsoft is moving past the browser to incorporate similar functionality into its Office and other products -- say Microsoft Word 2003's Research Pane, for example -- so it's clear the big boys would have us move to more proprietary, locked-in environments, which all of the top five applications have in common. We're not so much witnessing a demographic change as a deliberate shove by the main players. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My wish list? I'd like to see all of these players stop hoodwinking the end-user by loading their programs into the start-up queue automatically (you know who you are). It's deliberately misleading (read: sleazy), it hogs resources and it skews data like Nielsen's. I'd also like to see AOL, MSN and Yahoo all agree to share their instant messaging lists so folk like me don't have to use great alternatives like &lt;a href="http://www.trillian.cc" target="_blank"&gt;Trillian&lt;/a&gt; to pull together our disparate buddy networks (Trillian will lump all your different Instant Messaging accounts into one easy to view window, minus all the ads and annoying pop-ups). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I see no danger in the browser gradually  being phased out for plenty of web-related tasks. But, if the Internet has really become 'part of the desktop' let's try to make it a place where ordinary folk can hang out without too much hassle.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107276832438298440?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107276832438298440'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107276832438298440'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_28_archive.html#107276832438298440' title='Goodbye To The Browser?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107274546314955194</id><published>2003-12-30T07:51:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-30T07:52:08.076+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Online Holiday Spending Throws Up Some Kinks</title><content type='html'>I think we might have said this last year (and the year before) but this holiday appears to have been the Big One for spending online. According &lt;a href="http://rss.com.com/2100-1038_3-5133882.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=news" target="_blank"&gt;to a report&lt;/a&gt; by Goldman Sachs, Harris Interactive and Nielsen//NetRatings ('the eSpending Report') the total amount spent online was $15.8 billion, up a whopping 37% from 2002. (They don't say this was in the U.S., but I'm assuming it is.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's some interesting ticklers in the details too: While every category went up, a lot more was spent on practically everything except music this year. While folk seemed to spent a lot on clothes ($3.1 billion spent, up 40% over 2002), the biggest increase was in DVD and video ($1.4 billion, up 58%), a jump that could be explained largely by the rising popularity in DVD players, one of the biggest selling consumer items this year. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But it's the meagre 20% rise in online music spending that gets me. They splashed out only $790 million this year -- a bit more than half of what they spent on books or video. Now while some of this discrepancy may be blamed on the rise of the DVD -- they weren't available in such numbers last year, they're usually sold in the same store as music CDs -- it doesn't really hold water when you compare it to the books category, which has been available for years online (at least 1996, if not earlier) and yet also showed an impressive 39% growth, with folk spending $1.4 billion on tomes this year. Could this either be a sign of the lingering appeal of online file sharing, suspicion about the spread of 'hobbling technologies' that restrict usage of CDs, or a growing lack of interest in what is on offer at current prices? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've asked Nielsen for more data, so perhaps there's another explanation for this.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107274546314955194?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107274546314955194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107274546314955194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_28_archive.html#107274546314955194' title='Online Holiday Spending Throws Up Some Kinks'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107265739289590641</id><published>2003-12-29T07:23:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-29T07:24:16.403+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Some (Not So) Light Reading</title><content type='html'>For those of you easing back into work after the holidays, or stuck in the office before the New Year partying begins, here are some suggestions for Internet reading.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The  future of Microsoft: Is 2004 going to be Redmond's swansong? Some people think so, including &lt;a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13350" target="_blank"&gt;The Inquirer&lt;/a&gt;, which says that the company's flat first quarter earnings are a sign "it is running low on wiggle room, the core customers are negotiating hard, and Microsoft is giving way". Interesting, if somewhat aggressive, reading. For the usual Slashdot discussion of the topic, go &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/28/1611228" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. Certainly it's going to be a difficult year for Microsoft, and one way the company may go is to try to further lock in users to its formats -- Word, audio, Excel, whatever -- and to lock other software companies out. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's also the tack that veteran commentator &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1423033,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="_blank"&gt;Steve Gillmor believes Apple is taking with its iPod&lt;/a&gt;. He points out that what was once a MP3 player is now threatening to be a lot more than that, from a PDA to a video device (to a handphone, as well). But Gillmor also points out that this is part of a bigger battle to try to establish one kind of Digital Rights Management over another. (This basically is a legal and software trick that limits your freedom to copy or alter files, whether they're music, words or pictures. Say your version of Microsoft Word supported DRM, you may find yourself unable, say, to copy a document you're viewing, or to save it in another format, or, more insidiously, unable to access a Word document composed in a non-Microsoft program, say, Open Office. DRM effectively removes the kind of supremacy you've enjoyed over what you own: In music, for example, DRM would mean you rent rather than own your CD collection.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gillmor discusses Apple's approach, which is slightly different, but with seemingly similar goals: To lock the consumer into using a proprietary format. I think consumers will -- and should -- fight any attempt to limit access to their files, whether they be music, words, pictures or movies, tooth and nail. Legitimate fears of piracy and security should not allow any corporation to dictate the size or make of wall protecting us (look at e-voting for the lessons we should learn on that.). This year will define where we go on this issue. Or as Mr Gillmor says: "With the election looming as a referendum on issues of security, rights and opportunity, and the Internet emerging as a major player for the first time, DRM may be democracy's Last Waltz."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107265739289590641?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107265739289590641'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107265739289590641'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_28_archive.html#107265739289590641' title='Some (Not So) Light Reading'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107249065899285410</id><published>2003-12-27T09:04:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-27T09:05:20.843+07:00</updated><title type='text'></title><content type='html'>&lt;DIV align=left&gt;If you were one of the few who didn't get an iPod in their stocking this Christmas, don't despair: &lt;A href="http://www.designtechnica.com/"&gt;Designtechnica Articles&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;is reporting strong rumours that Apple may launch a $100 iPod next month. While current iPod units start at $300 and are based around a 10 to 40 gigabyte hard drive, the budget priced iPods are expected be Flash Memory based -- and so will not store so much. &lt;A href="http://www.thinksecret.com/news/mwsf04apple.html"&gt;ThinkSecret&lt;/A&gt;, meanwhile, says the new iPods will be smaller in size, hold either 2 or 4 gigabytes of music, and come in different colours -- including stripes. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;DIV align=left&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;DIV align=left&gt;If it's true, it will&amp;nbsp;be a smart move for Steve Jobs. While the iPod has been a big hit this holiday -- the &lt;A href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/click/rss/0.91/public/-/2/hi/technology/3344595.stm"&gt;BBC says&lt;/A&gt; UK stores are having problems keeping up with demand -- there is still a big market of folk who cannot afford the $300 or more for an iPod, leaving the field open for other manufacturers. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107249065899285410?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107249065899285410'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107249065899285410'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_21_archive.html#107249065899285410' title=''/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107222626587941509</id><published>2003-12-24T07:37:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-24T07:38:44.420+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Spam As Revenge?</title><content type='html'>Is spam being used as a business weapon to damage a competitor's reputation? Florida-based North American Liability Group, an insurance company, said yesterday it had "become aware that an unauthorized spam email was sent out about the Company by an unknown third party". A press release issued by the company said it "has discovered that someone who identified himself or itself as "RB" sent a spam email which contained information which did not come from the Company, was never approved by the Company and in fact, contained inaccurate information about the Company." It seems the company has no idea who RB is (and the company doesn't say what the spam contained: Either way, given public impatience with spam, it's not likely to enhance the company's image.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What benefit could RB possibly derive from such spam, unless it was to discredit the honest folks at North American? A disgruntled employee? A rival? Certainly spam is a potent way to damage reputations: I recall a year or so back trying to find out who sent out spam in the name of &lt;a href="http://www.templatestyles.com" target="_blank"&gt;TemplateStyles.com&lt;/a&gt;. The company itself denied all knowledge, but some angry respondents were suspicious, pointing to the lack of proper information about the company on its website. A year on it seems the site is now up for sale, so either the doubters were right or the spam killed off the company's chances. Either way it brought home how easy it would be to dent a reputation by sending out spam in someone's name. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then there's the Spam Slur: A few days back I started receiving an email alleging that some German individual "is a knave" who apparently does not deliver goods he has contracted to deliver. (I'm afraid I foolishly deleted several copies of the email, which was clearly sent out in spam-like quantities.) No one can trace the source of the slur, but the target is bound to have felt some pain at being labeled a knave. I haven't been called that since school.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107222626587941509?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107222626587941509'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107222626587941509'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_21_archive.html#107222626587941509' title='Spam As Revenge?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107222492095881107</id><published>2003-12-24T07:15:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-24T07:16:19.653+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Ho, Ho, Ho, Tis The Season Of The Online Scam</title><content type='html'>Phishing -- the art of depriving folk of their sensitive password data and then using it to empty their pockets -- has become the &lt;i&gt;scam du jour&lt;/i&gt; of the holiday season. The &lt;a href="http://www.anti-phishing.org/" target="_blank"&gt;Anti-Phishing.org&lt;/a&gt; website says it has seen 'dramatic' growth in November and December of email spoofing (emails claiming to be from, for example, your bank) and general fraud activity. (Anti-Phishing is an industry group founded by &lt;a href="http://www.tumbleweed.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Tumbleweed Communications&lt;/a&gt;, a builder of anti-spam software.) For example: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- More than 60 unique new phishing email fraud attacks have been launched against consumers in the last 2 weeks&lt;br /&gt;-- Over 60 million email fraud attacks are estimated to have been sent out in the same period - timed for the peak of the holiday season&lt;br /&gt;-- eBay customers were the most highly targeted by scammers, with 24 unique email fraud attacks over the past 60 days&lt;br /&gt;-- Online financial institutions, including banks, Visa and PayPal, represented the largest target group with 35 unique email fraud attacks reported over the past 60 days&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems that phishing has been remarkably rewarding for the scammers involved. The Anti-Phishing Working Group reckons an average of 5% of recipients respond to such emails, resulting in financial losses, identity theft, and other fraudulent activity. And, perhaps worse, this "activity threatens the integrity of companies that do business online". (I'm assuming they're talking about banks, eBay and other folk who rely on ordinary folk to maintain their faith in the security of online commerce.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are a number of ingenious scams that play on the holiday theme -- which also highlight that it's not just banks and big-ticket items that the phishers are targeting. One example is a fake online Christmas card, designed to compromise AOL accounts. In this scam, the recipient receives a spoofed email from the "AOL Hallmark" team, and is asked to visit a website to pick up his/her card. In order to access the site (which is run by the scammer), the user is asked to log in to his or her AOL account, thereby divulging the account name and password. The compromised account can then be used, anti-Phishing says, to launch further phishing attacks, virus attacks, spam, or other nefarious activity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clearly this sort of thing is going to grow, becoming more sophisticated as users wise up to the scams. Recent emails now play upon the growing awareness of scams by claiming to be from your bank, warning you about such scams and telling you to ignore other emails. They then, of course, go on to tell to visit the legitimate website to confirm your password. (The main component of this trick is that 90% of the email is genuine, in that the images are all from the bank's website, and if you hover your mouse over the link you're being asked to visit, it may well look genuine too. What you're actually seeing, is a clever ruse: the &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; website is buried at the end of the link, hidden after a lot of empty space. So checking that sort of thing is no longer enough. It should go without saying that you shouldn't react to any email that requires you to do anything with your password. For a good resource on such scams, check out &lt;a href="http://spamwatch.codefish.net.au/" target="_blank"&gt;Codefish&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the end all this will help educate users about the Internet and improving their own security. I don't see it doing any serious damage to online commerce, at least in terms of undermining public confidence. I do believe, however, that we've seen only the tip of the iceberg in terms of the sophistication of scammers, and banks and other online institutions &lt;b&gt;must&lt;/b&gt; improve their awareness of the threat, as well as protect and educate their customers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Have a phishing-free Christmas.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107222492095881107?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107222492095881107'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107222492095881107'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_21_archive.html#107222492095881107' title='Ho, Ho, Ho, Tis The Season Of The Online Scam'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107206019776122897</id><published>2003-12-22T09:29:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-22T09:30:54.500+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The iPod Battery Controversy Hits The Mainstream</title><content type='html'>The discussion about iPod batteries has entered the mainstream. You may recall posts on this blog a few weeks back about two brothers who took their complaint that Apple would not replace their worn out battery -- saying the warranty had expired, and suggesting they buy a new iPod -- public, via a &lt;a href="http://www.ipodsdirtysecret.com/" target="_blank"&gt;video posted onto the net&lt;/a&gt; and public defacement of Apple billboards. I tried to get a comment from Apple at the time, but felt they had less of a case the more I looked at the story: It turned out that Apple &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; replace batteries (for $99, which would give you a refurbished iPod) or alternatively, you could do it yourself with third party batteries, saving yourself up to $40. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16540-2003Dec19.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Washington Post has written up&lt;/a&gt; the experience of the Neistat brothers, and presented it as an example of the disposability of electronics, and of irate consumers fighting back.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's a great piece. Trouble is, I don't think the story is quite as simple as that. First off, there's some suggestion the brothers haven't been completely upfront. According to one academic who briefly hosted their video on his server, &lt;a href="http://das.doit.wisc.edu/" target="_blank"&gt;Dave Schroeder&lt;/a&gt;, there are some holes in their version: He says Apple began offering the replacement program nearly a week before the brothers' website was registered (ipoddirtysecret.com, on November 20; Apple's replacement program was announced on November 14). As Schroeder acknowledges in his letter to the Washington Post (&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=90050&amp;cid=7775986" target="_blank"&gt;posted at Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;), it was 'coincidentally close', but was before Apple had was aware of the brothers' video. (The Post article says the Apple announced expanded warranties for new iPod owners to purchase for $59, and also introduced a new $99 battery-replacement mail-in service for others "days after the movie made the rounds" of websites like Schroeders. The Neistat brothers themselves are more cautious on their &lt;a href="http://ipodsdirtysecret.com/message.html" target="_blank"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt;, saying  "After we finished production of the film, but not necessarily in response to it, Apple began offerring a battery replacement program for the iPod for a fee of $99 and an extended warranty for the ipod for $59".)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But did the brothers know about this before they posted their video? Schroeder says yes, saying he agreed to post their video on condition the brothers post a link on the same site to the Apple replacement program, something which he says they never did. (Schroeder has kept a record of their communications &lt;a href="http://das.doit.wisc.edu/neistatoriginal.txt" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.) If this is true, I don't see any way one can link the Neistat's campaign with Apple's decision to offer a refurbishing service. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But what about the allegation that Apple is building in obsolescence into what are already pricey gadgets, using batteries that die after 18 months and steering punters into replacing the whole unit for $400, while making it hard to replace the batteries without damaging the unit? not everyone agrees it's hard to replace the battery: &lt;a href="http://sozepiggytails.livejournal.com/27994.html" target="_blank"&gt;Here's an example of one user&lt;/a&gt; who felt confident her mother could do it  without help. But I have to say, I've fiddled around with my iPod a bit, trying to get the back off &lt;a href="http://www.ipodbattery.com/ipodinstall.htm" target="_blank"&gt;according to instructions&lt;/a&gt;, and would conclude that my mother wouldn't enjoy doing it. It's certainly tricky, and hard to do without scratching the iPod body. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My conclusion? I think Apple have been remiss in a) not introducing a refurbish program earlier, b) not making it easier to replace the batteries, and c) not immediately guiding the brothers to websites which sell do-it-yourself batteries. While the iPod is beautifully designed, I can't really see a reason for not including screws in the casing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But having said all that, I think we must be careful about guerrilla consumer actions such as those undertaken by the Neistat brothers. We may not not yet know the whole story (I've emailed both them and Apple asking for more information), but so far it seems that their campaign may have misled hundreds of thousands of users by not including, either in it or on websites where it was posted, information about alternatives to buying a new iPod. Consumer activism should not copy advertising. It should be informative, not deceptive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107206019776122897?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107206019776122897'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107206019776122897'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_21_archive.html#107206019776122897' title='The iPod Battery Controversy Hits The Mainstream'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107180312753510449</id><published>2003-12-19T10:05:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-19T10:06:21.543+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Note to loose wire readers</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Note to readers: I'm afraid I've not been able to update this site for a   day or two now due to problems with the hosting servers. For those of you   reading online, I suggest you move your browser/bookmark to the blog's new home,   &lt;A href="http://loosewireblog.com"&gt;loosewireblog.com&lt;/A&gt;; for those of you   accessing via RSS, to switch to the new &lt;A   href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/blog/index.rdf"&gt;feed&lt;/A&gt;, and for those of   you receiving this by email, to either switch to RSS or to have patience: I'll   be setting up an email subscription to the new site shortly.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107180312753510449?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107180312753510449'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107180312753510449'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107180312753510449' title='Note to loose wire readers'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107165210055089934</id><published>2003-12-17T16:08:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-17T16:09:12.780+07:00</updated><title type='text'>CD-Rom Business Cards. Huh?</title><content type='html'>I know I may be missing something here, but what is this all about business cards on a CD Rom? &lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3606098/" target="_blank"&gt;Newsweek reports&lt;/a&gt; increased sales of these things -- either full size or credit card sized and shaped -- which people hand out at trade shows: "General consensus in the biz world: why spring for color brochures at $5 a pop when CD cards average a buck each? For much more cash&amp;#8212;$3,000&amp;#8212;New York&amp;rsquo;s HYLife Productions can squeeze up to eight minutes of video on its cards."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://store5.yimg.com/I/citiscape-retail_1772_0" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have to say I have enough problems with real business cards that aren't the right shape or where the text is the wrong way up. Out here in Asia these small CD sized name cards came and went -- at least in my line of work -- a few years back, and I'm pretty sorry to hear that they may be making a comeback. First off, how exactly is 100 MB of Flash really going to help? And if the ones I received are anything to go by, folk would usually jazz up even the most basic contact details with fancy graphics so you could forget about simply copying and pasting the salient details into Outlook. Sorry but I'd rather the guy say 'Here's my name card but I'll email you my vCard". Or "Are you all Bluetoothed up? Let me beam it to you now." Or, if you like the guy and want to make a firm commitment, ask him: "Are you on &lt;a href="http://www.plaxo.com" target="_blank"&gt;Plaxo&lt;/a&gt;?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sure, I can understand the use of CD-Roms to hand out data about reunions, parties and whatnot, but most folk who would know what to do with that sort of thing are wired, so why not email it to them?  I already have way too many CD-Roms in my den; the last thing I want is funny shaped ones to add to them.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107165210055089934?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107165210055089934'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107165210055089934'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107165210055089934' title='CD-Rom Business Cards. Huh?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107164484028967033</id><published>2003-12-17T14:07:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-17T14:08:12.466+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Virtual World Gets Surprisingly Lifelike</title><content type='html'>The Sims Online - an Internet-only world where ordinary folk can take on another persona and interact with other folk virtually -- seems to be exhibiting all the signs of the real world, with a twist. &lt;a href="http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2003/12/12/sims_online_newspaper/" target="_blank"&gt;Salon carries an article&lt;/a&gt; about a Sims community called Alphaville, and some of its citizens, including an academic called Urizenus (in real life, Michigan philosophy professor &lt;a href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/~ludlow/" target="_blank"&gt;Peter Ludlow&lt;/a&gt;), a young man (or, possibly, a boy) called Evangeline, allegations of extortion, and the possible existence of a virtual brothel. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The story is well worth a read (subscription or day pass only), if only for its glimpse on the moral responsibilities a corporation running a community may have. If someone opens a virtual brothel for online folk to indulge in a little cyber-sex, is the company managing that world -- in this case Electronic Arts -- guilty of prostitution? And what happens if there's evidence the 'madam' of that brothel, and some of its employees, are underage? And then, exploring the matter further, is Electronic Arts guilty of censorship by terminating the account of the academic who chronicled such allegations in his online newspaper, &lt;a href="http://alphavilleherald.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Alphaville Herald&lt;/a&gt;? And if there's (ultimately) real money involved, should the police be called in to this virtual world? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm not surprised a philosophy professor is interested in these kind of issues. Going back to the early days of the Internet, the virtual world has a habit of impinging on the real. In that sense there's nothing different between real estate and virtual estate. If humans interact on it, it's turf and it needs to be policed. It will be interesting to see how EA handle this case, and whether they start patrolling their creation more thoroughly. And if they do, will it cease to be economically viable? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More  discussion on this on &lt;a href="http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/13/221218" target="_blank"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;. Here's an &lt;a href="http://www.alphavilleherald.com/archives/000049.html" target="_blank"&gt;'interview' by Ludlow with Evangeline&lt;/a&gt; (parental discretion advised, via &lt;a href="http://boingboing.net/2003_12_01_archive.html#107160120306956398" target="_blank"&gt;Boing Boing Blog&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107164484028967033?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107164484028967033'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107164484028967033'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107164484028967033' title='The Virtual World Gets Surprisingly Lifelike'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107161880966493369</id><published>2003-12-17T06:53:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-17T06:54:20.873+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Future Of The Net</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/Default.aspx?id=3606168&amp;p1=0" target="_blank"&gt;Newsweek takes a look&lt;/a&gt;  (via &lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031216/140237.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;TechDirt&lt;/a&gt;) at a future Internet controlled by corporations and governments through Digital Rights Management, secure chips and micropayments. It's an interesting article, and makes me ponder some interesting supplementary questions: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Are spammers, for example, the enemy of ordinary Internet folk, or virtual Robin Hoods eluding corporate control of the web? We all hate them now, true, but may we look back on them -- at some future point when corporate and governmental control dominates the web -- as tolerable evidence of the Internet's chaotic freedom? By trying to push them off the Internet through legal means, are we just tying our own future in knots? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another thought: are micropayments the saviour of small business on the Internet, or just a trick by big corporates to tie us into their trickling subscription model? Living in Indonesia -- banned by PayPal and many smaller online sellers, which won't accept any payments from such a lawless country -- I know a little of what it feels like to hostage to the bigger e-commerce sites, because they're the only ones to accept my dollar. In the future, will it only be the big companies who have the risk models and infrastructure to do online business in a world of online IDs, DRMs and micropayments? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm confident that the anarchic tendencies of the Internet will undermine many corporate efforts to lock in customers: The online music site that thrives will be the one with the broadest range of file formats and the smallest limitation on how those files are used, stored and copied. Methods to cripple or limit use of software will always be cracked. Indignation will limit the advance of chip-based IDs -- in your computer, around your neck, in your handphone. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I think those of us calling for regulation, standardisation and crackdowns on the Internet to make it safe for the ordinary user need to think harder about other threats to its future, in particular anything that punishes or banishes anonymity, anything that discriminates against the user accessing the web based on his/her point of entry (country, state, neighbourhood) and, in particular, any corporate which tries to set up tollbooths to grab a nickel every time we do something we used to be able to do for free.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107161880966493369?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107161880966493369'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107161880966493369'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107161880966493369' title='The Future Of The Net'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107158951491365697</id><published>2003-12-16T22:45:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-16T22:46:06.093+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Year Of The Worm</title><content type='html'>Nothing new in this, but a fascinating summary of this year's viruses, and a sober reminder of how tricky it's all getting: &lt;a href="http://www.f-secure.com/2003/" target="_blank"&gt;F-Secure's review of 2003&lt;/a&gt; makes for interesting reading. This for example, on how the Slammer worm caused so much network traffic: &lt;blockquote&gt;In theory, there are some 4 billion public IP addresses on the Internet. The Slammer worm was released on January 25, 2003 around 04:31 UTC. By 04:45 it had scanned through all Internet addresses - in less than 15 minutes! This operation can be compared to an automatic system dialing all available phone numbers in the world in 15 minutes. As on the net, only a small number of phones would answer the call but the lines would certainly be congested.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Or the Bugbear.B worm, which tried to steal information from banks and other financial institutions: &lt;blockquote&gt;To this end, the worm carried a list of network addresses of more than 1300 banks. Among them were network addresses of American, African, Australian, Asian and European banks. As soon as this functionality was discovered, F-Secure warned the listed financial institutions about the potential threat. The response time of the F-Secure Anti-Virus Research Unit was 3 hours 59 minutes from the detection of the worm to the release of an anti-virus update. F-Secure also published a free tool to clean systems affected by Bugbear.B.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Or Sobig.F, which waited for a couple of days after infecting a machine and then turned affected machines into e-mail proxy servers: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The reason soon became apparent: spammers, or organizations sending bulk e-mail ads, used these proxies, which Sobig had created, to redistribute spam on a massive scale. Computers of innocent home users were taken over with the help of the worm and soon they were used to send hundreds of thousands of questionable advertisements without the owner being aware of this.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is likely that there's a virus writer group behind Sobig. They planned the operation, then used the worm to infect a huge number of computers and then sold various spammer groups lists of proxy servers which would be open for spreading spam. It was clearly a business operation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;A great read, and fodder for a novel were it not just the start of a difficult time for the Internet.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107158951491365697?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107158951491365697'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107158951491365697'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107158951491365697' title='The Year Of The Worm'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107156645814644632</id><published>2003-12-16T16:20:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-16T16:21:49.200+07:00</updated><title type='text'>More On Google's Masterplan</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/technology/content/dec2003/tc20031216_9018_tc047.htm?tc"&gt;BusinessWeek &lt;/a&gt;pick up the theme of &lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/blog/2003/12/google_the_port.html"&gt;Google taking on the world.&lt;/a&gt; With the ability to track shipments and airplanes in real time via Google, the search engine keeps eyeballs on its website longer. But "Google is providing this new shipment tracking service even though it doesn't have a partnership with FedEx. Rather, Google engineers have reprogrammed it to query FedEx directly with the information a user enters and provide the hyperlink direct to the customer's information."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But, BusinessWeek point out, "with every new service, Google takes a slice of someone else's pie. Its ability to find pizza places within any given Zip code ultimately eliminates the use of YellowPages. Using it to find word definitions diminishes the business proposition of online dictionaries."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The argument goes that "Google becomes the omnipresent middleman and a clear and present danger to just about any company that relies on the Internet for commerce." But where is the revenue? I think BusinessWeek is right in saying the money will be in providing the gateway to those sites. Most folk I know go to Google first, indeed have it as their homepage. The more you can access from that fast-loading, uncluttered page, the more you'll use it as your homepage. Who cares where you go next? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It has nothing to do with stickiness in the way we used to think of it. Google doesn't need people to stay at Google. But folk like UPS and FedEx need to have the link with Google -- especially if their competitors have it. For them Google becomes their customers' first stop. Whether it's cinema tickets, airline tickets, packages or whatever, Google will act as a kind of fast-searching gatekeeper for other sites. Those other sites may not have much choice -- they don't already, with the site: hack on Google working as a better search engine for individual sites than the site's search page -- but they'll all draw benefit. And presumably Google will collect a toll, in advertising or something else.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's the New Portal: Empty, except for what you need, and fast.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107156645814644632?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107156645814644632'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107156645814644632'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107156645814644632' title='More On Google&apos;s Masterplan'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107155808721589778</id><published>2003-12-16T14:01:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-16T14:02:18.450+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Nokia Sets An Example For RSS</title><content type='html'>Here's a sign of what a company can do with RSS, winning fans, distributing information and building bridges. Technical consultant and blogger &lt;a href="http://www.russellbeattie.com/notebook/1005359.html" target="_blank"&gt;Russell Beattie&lt;/a&gt; points to a wonderful page by &lt;a href="http://ncsp.forum.nokia.com/content/" target="_blank"&gt;Nokia&lt;/a&gt;, containing all of Nokia's documents, announcements and toolkits via a bunch of different RSS feeds. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Russell says, "There's sooooo much to be gleaned from Nokia's site it's incredible." He points to just one document, a presentation &lt;a href="http://ncsp.forum.nokia.com/downloads/nokia/documents/Mobile_Market_Services.pdf"&gt;Music, video, streaming contents services Demand in Asia Pacific&lt;/a&gt; which has some fascinating facts about current mobile data services world wide:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Approx 1 billion SMS/day globally &lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Mobile ring tones are already a USD 3-5billion business &lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;UK ring tones market will overtake the CDs singlesmarket 2003&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;UK: over 780 million WAPpage impression /month in June 2003 (130% growthin 9 months)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Est~10 millionmobile Java downloadsglobally / month in June 2003&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Over 75 operators have launched mobile Java services&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Over 140 operatorshave launched MMS(Aug 2003)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;mmo2 reportsapprox 5 MMS /monthsper active user&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Over 20 operatorshave launched mobile video content services (MMS video, streaming)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There's enough there for a dozen columns. But what I like is that Nokia have taken the trouble to present all this information in an accessible way. My grumble with Nokia until now is that their sites are not intuitive -- unlike their cellphones -- but you can't say that anymore. I wish more companies would do this kind of thing. It's not rocket science but it is helpful.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107155808721589778?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107155808721589778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107155808721589778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107155808721589778' title='Nokia Sets An Example For RSS'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107154507356930527</id><published>2003-12-16T10:24:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-16T10:25:24.326+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Zone Labs Snapped Up - Firewalls R Us?</title><content type='html'>My favourite firewall, Zone Alarm, is being bought by another firewall maker, Check Point Software Technologies &lt;a title="Check Point to buy Zone Labs for $205 million" href="http://rss.com.com/2100-7355_3-5124542.html?part=rss&amp;amp;tag=feed&amp;amp;subj=news"&gt;[CNet News.com]&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It looks to me as if there's quite significant consolidation within the security software industry, not just from the point of view of big guys buying the smaller guys, but of companies trying to create products that offer an all-round 'security solution'. Symantec have long peddled this type of idea, but in their 2004 editions have increased the coverage to include cutting out spam, spyware and even pop-ups. With Check Point focusing on server-side software it makes sense that they grab Zone Labs, whose strength is software for desktops and notebooks. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Expect to see software companies trying to push more integrated software that offers this kind of overall solution to corporates and to ISPs. While it obviously makes sense for companies to farm out these kind of problems -- viruses, spam, any kind of disrupting influence on their networks -- Internet Service Providers will doubtless see a market to sell something similar to the individual user, keeping such rubbish out of their inbox and away from other subscribers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My only worry is that such 'packaged solutions' may not offer the best individual component: Just because a company makes all the products you need, doesn't mean they're all great. I use Norton Antivirus but stick with Zone Alarm because it tells me more about what's going on.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107154507356930527?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107154507356930527'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107154507356930527'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107154507356930527' title='Zone Labs Snapped Up - Firewalls R Us?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107153361182976481</id><published>2003-12-16T07:13:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-16T07:14:22.653+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Are Privacy Fears About RFID Tags Just Hype?</title><content type='html'>Reports that delegates to the World Summit on the Information Society conference in Geneva were unwittingly wearing RFID tags which could have tracked their movements, attendance at meetings or seminars, visits to the john etc etc has raised some debate about RFID (Radio Frequency ID), privacy, security and the rights of the individual to know what the tag around their neck actually tells people about them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My posting, which didn't actually make any specific comment about the news, prompted this from &lt;a href="http://www.bitsplitter.net/blog/index.php?p=38" target="_blank"&gt;Mike Rowehl of Bitsplitter&lt;/a&gt; who says, among other things, that "surre, there are plenty of issues to be worked through with RFID, but it&amp;rsquo;s hardly the boogeyman that everyone makes it out to be. A cell phone can just as easily (and in the future, more easily most likely) be used to determine a users location". &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually, Mike, I'm not sure that's right. Cellphones work in large areas, and can narrow the location of a phone (and its user) down to quite a small area, but RFID works in small, enclosed areas. As one of the delegates, Olivier Piou of &lt;a href="http://www.axalto.com/index.asp" target="_blank"&gt;Axalto&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.itu.int/wsis/geneva/coverage/statements/axalto/b16.html" target="_blank"&gt;told the conference&lt;/a&gt; last Friday:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Wireless technologies also present a similar threat to privacy: while it is relatively easy to turn off a cellular phone (because all of them have an ON/OFF button!), radio-frequency identification systems - also known as RFID or contactless systems - are activated from a distance. It becomes so very easy to install a reading antenna, in the subway or in any place like in this conference room, to detect who is there without awareness and consent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Numerous books and movies have predicted that our civil society would not be wise enough to protect its basic universal human rights in this digital age. However, the more we have powerful tools available to us, the more we have the duty to use them for the best of humanity. This is why I wanted to raise your awareness today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is why also, we at Axalto believe that it is essential that digital identity be designed to ensure trust and confidence in modern digital systems, and that it be combined with conventional physical identity into a secure portable object that citizens can voluntarily present to be identified, to authorities in the physical world and to on-line services in the virtual world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That this comes from an industry insider -- Axalto is the new name of Schlumberger unit SmartCards, of which Olivier Piou has been president since 1998; he has been in the smart card business since 1994. (Smart cards are microprocessor cards used mainly for ID) -- should give some weight to concerns raised by the use of RFID at the summit. That the summit itself, supposedly concerning itself with the information society, should not be more aware of a) the privacy aspects of its tags and b) unable to answer questions raised by privacy advocates, does not inspire confidence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While I don't agree with the more outlandish claims that RFID is a new kind of big brother, there's little doubt in my mind that it's a technology which needs some serious attention before it can be deployed in public.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107153361182976481?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107153361182976481'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107153361182976481'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107153361182976481' title='Are Privacy Fears About RFID Tags Just Hype?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107145946314081460</id><published>2003-12-15T10:37:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-15T10:38:32.733+07:00</updated><title type='text'>loosewire blog notice -- We're Moving</title><content type='html'>My apologies for moving again, but we're gradually relocating the loosewire blog to new premises. This URL is the best one to use: &lt;a href="http://loosewireblog.com" target="_blank"&gt;loosewireblog.com&lt;/a&gt;. The new site uses TypePad, which offers greater flexibility for categorising and archiving posts. Let me know what you think about the move. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you're an RSS feed user, please change your feed to &lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/blog/index.rdf" target="_blank"&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; (right click, copy the address, and paste it into your newsfeed reader. (I'm using &lt;a href="http://www.hutteman.com/weblog/" target="_blank"&gt;Luke Hutteman's&lt;/a&gt; excellent &lt;a href="http://www.sharpreader.net/" target="_blank"&gt;SharpReader&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Email subscribers will be catered for, although I'm not quite sure how at the moment. Those who can, I'd encourage to take the RSS feed and then unsubscribe from the mailing list. Let me know if you have problems doing so. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'll keep this site going a while longer, but will have to stop at some point.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107145946314081460?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145946314081460'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145946314081460'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107145946314081460' title='loosewire blog notice -- We&apos;re Moving'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107145895223333256</id><published>2003-12-15T10:29:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-15T10:30:02.046+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Getting Dumb With PowerPoint?</title><content type='html'>I'm a fan of Edward Tufte, the guru of charts, but I'm still not sure about his view of PowerPoint. The &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/14/magazine/14POWER.html?ex=1071982800&amp;en=799ad449b398c2d7&amp;ei=5062&amp;partner=GOOGLE" target="_blank"&gt;New York Times Magazine&lt;/a&gt; has another article on his recent &lt;a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint" target="_blank"&gt;polemic&lt;/a&gt; against Microsoft's presentation software. Tufte claimed, as the NYT piece says, that Microsoft's ubiquitous software forces people to mutilate data beyond comprehension, infusing PowerPoint with ''an attitude of commercialism that turns everything into a sales pitch.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/graphics/cover_vdqi.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not that Microsoft gets it either: NYT quotes Simon Marks, the product manager for PowerPoint, as saying that the opposite is 'data density', shoving tons of data at an audience. You could do that with PowerPoint, he says, but it's a matter of choice. ''If people were told they were going to have to sit through an incredibly dense presentation,'' he adds, ''they wouldn't want it.'' &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NYT's conclusion: If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you not say it.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107145895223333256?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145895223333256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145895223333256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107145895223333256' title='Getting Dumb With PowerPoint?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107145695225294985</id><published>2003-12-15T09:55:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-15T09:56:41.593+07:00</updated><title type='text'>RFID Secretly Tags The Internet Summit</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/14/1521212" target="_blank"&gt;The Washington Times has&lt;/a&gt; an interesting piece about the the Internet and technology summit in Switzerland last week. Delegates, it says, were unknowingly bugged with RFID tags, according to researchers who attended the forum. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;RFID is Radio Frequency ID, which means the tags could have contained and given off all sorts of information, including the wearer's exact location. The badges were handed out to more than 50 prime ministers, presidents and other high-level officials from 174 countries, including the United States. Researchers questioned summit officials about the use of the chips and how long information would be stored but were not given answers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-day forum focused on Internet governance and access, security, intellectual-property rights and privacy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107145695225294985?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145695225294985'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145695225294985'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107145695225294985' title='RFID Secretly Tags The Internet Summit'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107145573899143249</id><published>2003-12-15T09:35:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-15T09:36:28.560+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Beware The Granny Spammer</title><content type='html'>Here's a different take on the spam wars: the granny spammer. &lt;a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/content/business/1203/14spammain.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Atlanta Journal-Constitution tells the story&lt;/a&gt; of Flo Fox, a graying grandmother in a "What Would Jesus Do?" T-shirt who uses a couple of shopworn computers to out millions of junk e-mails for merchandise ranging from land in Belize to blessed coins. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://img.coxnewsweb.com/B/03/71/15/image_315713.jpg" width="133" height="150" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I found interesting about the story, apart from the granny bit, is that the spammers interviewed say they have established Internet accounts in countries where spam isn't controlled, though they won't say where. "You're not going to stop it," one of the spammers is quoted as saying. "Most of us go offshore now. You have to hide where you are." This is where Asia comes in, big: Korea, China, India, Pakistan and possibly Malaysia top my list of suspects. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(More discussion about the people in question, by people who apparently go to church with them, on &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/14/198202" target="_blank"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, the place where everybody knows your name.)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107145573899143249?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145573899143249'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107145573899143249'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107145573899143249' title='Beware The Granny Spammer'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107144758738661314</id><published>2003-12-15T07:19:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-15T07:20:37.090+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Windows 98 - Is Microsoft Really Dumping Users?</title><content type='html'>This from reader Jim Erlandson on Microsoft's &lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/blog/2003/12/windows_98_user.html" target="_blank"&gt;declining support for Windows 98&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font color="#000080"&gt;"Windows 98 support isn&amp;rsquo;t dropping off the face of the earth according to Microsoft. &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-US;w98" target="_blank"&gt;$35 per incident phone support&lt;/a&gt; is. How many people do you know who have spent $35 for a phone call to Microsoft lately?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And a &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5121458.html?tag=nefd_top" target="_blank"&gt;quote in C|Net&lt;/a&gt; indicates that security updates will probably still be released as needed. The company's policy would not ordinarily call for Microsoft to provide any security-related patches, but in an e-mailed statement, the company said it would evaluate future threats as they emerge. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"In addition to the robust set of third-party security products we encourage all Windows customers to use, including antivirus and firewall products, (after Jan. 16) we will evaluate malicious threats to our customers' systems on a case-by-case basis and take appropriate steps," Microsoft said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1410081,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="_blank"&gt;That bit about&lt;/a&gt; &amp;#8220;more than 80 percent of companies surveyed were still using Windows 98 and/or Windows 95.&amp;#8221; would be more interesting if they quoted percent of desktops. By their method, a company with thousands of Win XP machines and a single Win 98 box in the basement running the boiler would add to that 80 percent number &amp;#8211; but not in a meaningful way."&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks, Jim. All good points. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107144758738661314?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107144758738661314'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107144758738661314'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_14_archive.html#107144758738661314' title='Windows 98 - Is Microsoft Really Dumping Users?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107128995345028873</id><published>2003-12-13T11:32:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-13T11:33:21.186+07:00</updated><title type='text'>More Search Tools</title><content type='html'>Search seems to be this week's Thang. &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1412563,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="_blank"&gt;eWeek reports&lt;/a&gt; that Groxis is about to launch a new version of its desktop software that can retrieve results from multiple search engines and instantly categorize them. Rather than returning a simple list of results, &lt;a href="http://www.groxis.com/cgi-bin/grok/g2_teaser.html" target="_blank"&gt;Grokker 2&lt;/a&gt; groups them into various categories that are displayed in a visual map of icons, allowing users to drill down to find specific sites or content. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.groxis.com/grok/images/foundation/g_logo.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Version 2, eWeek says, Grokker has its own intelligence engine that analyzes content in order to categorize it on the fly. It also pulls search results from significantly more sources of information. Don't expect Grokker 2 to be cheap: Grokker 1 cost $100 for a single user license.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107128995345028873?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107128995345028873'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107128995345028873'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107128995345028873' title='More Search Tools'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107128884921499877</id><published>2003-12-13T11:14:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-13T11:14:57.186+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Google The Portal?</title><content type='html'>At what point does Google stop being a search engine and start being what we used to call a Portal? Or has it already happened? Yesterday it announced a &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/help/features.html#number" target="_blank"&gt;new search feature&lt;/a&gt; for tracking shipments via Federal Express and United Parcel Service. Type in your tracking number into Google and it will take you directly to the relevant company's webpage, &lt;a href="http://rss.com.com/2100-1038_3-5121824.html?part=rss&amp;tag=feed&amp;subj=news" target="_blank"&gt;CNET reports&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.google.com/images/google_sm.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new "Search by Number" feature also brings up information linked to other kinds of numbers, such as patent numbers, equipment identification numbers issued by the Federal Communications Commission, and airplane registration numbers from the Federal Aviation Administration (for checking flight delays). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As &lt;a href="http://www.resourceshelf.com/archives/2003_12_01_resourceshelf_archive.html#107118818417305973" target="_blank"&gt;Gary Price of ResourceShelf points out,&lt;/a&gt; offering such specialized information is not new: Ask Jeeves has been working on something called Smart Answers, AltaVista on Shortcuts for even longer. It's intriguing that what folk a few years back thought would be popular -- lots of noisy graphics and titbits of news in an all-flashing, all-dancing big brand portal -- is being overtaken by something very, very simple: a quiet, white interface that lets you find what you want, whether it's a recipe or a patent, fast. I kinda like that.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107128884921499877?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107128884921499877'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107128884921499877'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107128884921499877' title='Google The Portal?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107123230024821122</id><published>2003-12-12T19:31:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-12T19:32:27.340+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Another Kind Of Popup?</title><content type='html'>Maybe it's been around a while, but I only spotted it just now: a new kind of contextual, but only mildly relevant, pop-up link advertising. OK, that's not what it's called, but it describes it pretty accurately. It's called IntelliTXT and it comes from a company called &lt;a href="http://vibrantmedia.com/index.asp" target="_blank"&gt;Vibrant Media&lt;/a&gt;; it appears as a hyperlink to a word like any other hyperlink but it's in green. Nothing too weird there. Then you notice text appearing in a little help box thing: It's not a pop-up ad, exactly, but then it's not exactly what you expect either, as in a link to a site directly related to the word in question. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://vibrantmedia.com/content/images/logo_inside.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's an example, courtesy of InfoSync World: the word &lt;a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/4413.html" target="_blank"&gt;'mobile'&lt;/a&gt; on this page for example, has a link and pop-up box that says 'Windows Mobile--Your stuff, now available on the fly. Software for Smartphone, Pocket PC, or Pocket PC Phone Edition. Click here to see it for yourself!' which then takes you to a vibrantmedia page (which seems to be a broken link at time of writing). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The word Internet, meanwhile, offers you 'DIRECWAY - Internet Access -- Surf the Web via satellite. Available nationwide. Only $69.97 down and $99 a month. Includes the Direcway System and professional installation. Always on connection requires no phone line'. That link does, after a lot of waiting while the request goes through the Vibrant Media servers, take you to a Yahoo webpage where you can subscribe to Direcway, if the feeling so takes you. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is cheeky, though perhaps not offensive. What's also cheeky is that you don't have any easy way of telling where the link might be taking you: Right-clicking on the link appears to be disabled. Neither can you view in the status bar of your browser the link in question: instead there lurks more text along the lines of the above. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This reminds me of something called &lt;a href="http://www.richlink.com/nav.pl?page=/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;RichLink&lt;/a&gt; from Sentius, which does pretty much the same thing (well, officially, 'software that automates the management of links and metadata to deliver point-of-interest content to end-users at the word, phrase, and metadata level for any Web application'). If I recall it used to provide medical definitions for the &lt;a href="http://www.reutershealth.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Reuters Health website&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Too early to make a judgement, but my first stab is that in a world increasingly annoyed by popups, the danger of alienating readers with links that aren't anything more than ads of questionable relevance seems to be quite high.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107123230024821122?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107123230024821122'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107123230024821122'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107123230024821122' title='Another Kind Of Popup?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107122624188548318</id><published>2003-12-12T17:50:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-12T17:51:28.653+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Windows 98 Users Face A Scary Future</title><content type='html'>A by-product of Microsoft's decision to phase out support for some of its 'old' products, citing &lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N733.msn/B1236376.73;sz=300x250;ord=[timestamp]?" target="_blank"&gt;Java-related legal issues&lt;/a&gt;: users are going to be very exposed to viruses and bad stuff like that. Ottawa-based AssetMetrix Research Labs found that more than 80 percent of companies surveyed were still using Windows 98 and/or Windows 95. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"On January 16th, 2004, Microsoft Windows 98 enters the non-support portion of its support lifecycle. Windows 98 is considered obsolete, and security-based hot fixes will not be generally available for users of Windows 98 or Windows 98-Second Edition," &lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1410081,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594" target="_blank"&gt;eWeek quoted&lt;/a&gt; Steve O'Halloran, managing director of AssetMetrix Research Labs, as saying. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is daft. According to &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/34387.html" target="_blank"&gt;some reports&lt;/a&gt;, Microsoft doesn't need to do all this until next September, raising suspicions that it's just trying to make Sun -- owner of Java -- look like the evil wolf, and to force buying folk to migrate to XP. If any of this is true, I'd like to see Microsoft agree to provide security updates for at least Windows 98 users for as long as they can. I can't see Sun, or the courts, objecting to that.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107122624188548318?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107122624188548318'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107122624188548318'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107122624188548318' title='Windows 98 Users Face A Scary Future'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107118738590425454</id><published>2003-12-12T07:03:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-12T07:03:52.860+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Phone Commercials And Sloppy Eaters</title><content type='html'>Alan Reiter, the camera phone guy, has &lt;a href="http://www.wirelessmoment.com/2003/12/another_day_ano.html" target="_blank"&gt;some interesting stuff to say&lt;/a&gt; about how phone companies are shooting themselves in the foot with dumb commercials that only reinforcing perceptions that camera+phone=public menace. He points to a TV commercial of a girl snapping a guy eating pasta like a slob, and then sending it to the guy's fiancee. (I don't know how this mini-story ends, but I assume the message is: "Buy a camera phone and avoid foolish mistakes like marrying a guy who doesn't eat nice".)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, Alan asks, "Wouldn't you think that with all the money the handset vendors and cellular operators can spend on advertising and marketing, they would be able to come up with commercials that not only target the right demographics, but also wouldn't wave a red flag in front of people who want to ban phones?" I agree. The ads I've seen in this part of the world only convince me that marketing folk haven't got a clue about what users could do with these gadgets and so build their commercials around nonsensical scenarios involving butterflies, ocean-going yachts and beautiful people in tight sweaters. I think municipalities should ban the commercials, not the phones.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107118738590425454?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118738590425454'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118738590425454'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107118738590425454' title='Phone Commercials And Sloppy Eaters'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107118637209435412</id><published>2003-12-12T06:46:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-12T06:46:58.450+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Use Your Phone As A Barcode Scanner</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/4402.html" target="_blank"&gt;infoSync World reports&lt;/a&gt; of new software that allows camera phone users to take a picture of a barcode and then, say, retrieve information about the product: whether it's cheaper elsewhere, dietary information, or downloading music samples from a poster advertising a new album. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.scanbuy.com/images/scanzoomdiagram.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The product, &lt;a href="http://www.scanbuy.com/scanzoom.htm" target="_blank"&gt;ScanZoom&lt;/a&gt;, is made by US-based software company Scanbuy. The article points out that a similar technology is already available in Japan, where phones can recognize e-mail addresses, web site URLs and telephone numbers through their embedded cameras.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107118637209435412?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118637209435412'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118637209435412'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107118637209435412' title='Use Your Phone As A Barcode Scanner'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107118579595182531</id><published>2003-12-12T06:36:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-12T06:37:22.576+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Logitech, the Bluetooth Hubster</title><content type='html'>I'm still playing with mine, but on the surface Logitech look like they may be the first to fashion a real Bluetooth hub for the PC. The problem has been to develop a dongle, or some other widget, that can easily turn a non-Bluetooth PC into one that can easily recognise and deal with other Bluetooth devices. I've tried a lot and have yet to find one that works seamlessly. (The word 'seamlessly' and 'Bluetooth' don't usually appear in the same sentence.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.logitech.com/lang/images/0/2704.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile &lt;a href="http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20031210005041&amp;newsLang=en" target="_blank"&gt;Logitech has announced&lt;/a&gt; that its own candidate, the &lt;a href="http://www.logitech.com/bluetooth" target="_blank"&gt;Bluetooth Wireless Hub&lt;/a&gt;, now works with the latest Bluetooth phones from Sony Ericsson and Nokia; new PDAs from Toshiba, HP, and palmOne; as well as hands-free headsets from Sony Ericsson, Motorola and Nokia.  It's worth checking out, although one word of warning: As far as I can work out, the hub will only work if you connect it directly to a USB port -- and not to an external hub. If your PC only has one or two USB ports, and you're using a lot of (non Bluetooth) USB gadgets, that can be a major no-no.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107118579595182531?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118579595182531'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107118579595182531'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107118579595182531' title='Logitech, the Bluetooth Hubster'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107115572844743253</id><published>2003-12-11T22:15:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-11T22:16:14.873+07:00</updated><title type='text'>A New Search Toolbar -- From Copernic</title><content type='html'>This from the folks at Copernic, who produced a wonderful search engine called, er, Copernic, that has, perhaps, been overtaken by Google: introducing &lt;a href="http://www.copernic.com/meta" target="_blank"&gt;Copernic Meta&lt;/a&gt;, "completely new search software that can search multiple search engines in under a second directly from the Windows desktop bar or an IE browser".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.copernic.com/en/products/meta/images/screenshots/metadeskbar2.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The file is a tad over a megabyte, and installs both into Internet Explorer and your taskbar (the bit at the bottom of the Windows 98/XP screen). Type a phrase in there and it will search nearly every search engine, and throw up a melange of results familiar to anyone who's used Copernic the program. It's elegant, configurable -- and free.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107115572844743253?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107115572844743253'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107115572844743253'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107115572844743253' title='A New Search Toolbar -- From Copernic'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107113923648551764</id><published>2003-12-11T17:40:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-11T17:41:22.373+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Music Formats And The Death Of Ownership</title><content type='html'>One thing I still don't quite get is how online music will work in the long run -- who will own it? What will happen to it if the company you bought the songs from goes bust? And what happens if you're not near an Internet connection? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;None of these issues seem any clearer with the announcement by the world's largest software and music companies, who on Wednesday, according to &lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=technologyNews&amp;storyID=3973652" target="_blank"&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031210/2238240.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;Techdirt&lt;/a&gt;), issued an initial set of technology specifications in a bid to create a system in which users would share customized Internet links, called "content references," instead of swapping song or film files directly. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From what I understand this would be like accessing a file on the Internet via hyperlinks -- basically how you use your browser now -- for which you would pay, either by subscription, or each time you listened to it, or whatever. I know it's a knee jerk reaction but to me this all sounds dumb. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A subscription approach may work for certain products -- movies, say, which folk may only want to watch once -- but music is a movable feast. We want to listen to it on the road, in the gym, in the bath, at the top of a mountain, on a long air/road/boat/train ride. Music, almost by definition, is not a static product. What's more, clearly this new approach is designed to squeeze more money out of the punter. For what? Do we actually end up owning the music, getting great sleeve notes, a product with lots of memories attached to it? Almost certainly not. It's a dripfeed revenue model, where we pay cents, thinking we're saving dollars, whereas all we're doing is paying a toll for something that once upon a time we could actually buy and keep. Or am I overreacting?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107113923648551764?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107113923648551764'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107113923648551764'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107113923648551764' title='Music Formats And The Death Of Ownership'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107106751652461609</id><published>2003-12-10T21:45:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-10T21:46:01.513+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Camera Phones. They're Catching On</title><content type='html'>Further to my Loose Wire column last week about camera phones, here's some evidence to back up my shock assertion that they're catching on. &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/68/34436.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Register quotes market watcher Canalys&lt;/a&gt; as saying almost as many as shipped in the last quarter as shipped in the whole of the first half of 2003. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By 2006, over half of all mobile phones shipped will include cameras, Canalys reckons.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107106751652461609?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107106751652461609'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107106751652461609'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107106751652461609' title='Camera Phones. They&apos;re Catching On'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107104560986674994</id><published>2003-12-10T15:40:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-10T15:40:54.700+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Worm Hits Diebold's Windows ATMs</title><content type='html'>It's not happy days for Diebold, the company behind ATMs and electronic voting. Its e-voting machines have been the source of much controversy -- earlier this month&lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/test/2003/12/update_diebold_.html" target="_blank"&gt; it withdrew its suit&lt;/a&gt; against people who had posted leaked documents about alleged security breaches in the software. Now its automatic teller machines have been hit -- by viruses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.diebold.com/solutions/atms/images/atms_callout1.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wired reports that ATMs at two banks running Microsoft Windows software were infected by a computer virus in August, the maker of the machines said. The ATM infections, &lt;a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/7517" target="_blank"&gt;first reported by SecurityFocus.com&lt;/a&gt;, are believed to be the first of a computer virus wiggling directly onto cash machines. (&lt;a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/2164" target="_blank"&gt;The Register said in January&lt;/a&gt; that the Slammer worm brought down 13,000 Bank of America ATMs, but they weren't directly infected: the worm infected database servers on the same network, spewing so much traffic the cash machines couldn't process transactions.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But how can an ATM get infected? &lt;a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/7517" target="_blank"&gt;SecurityFocus says&lt;/a&gt; that while "ATMs typically sit on private networks or VPNs, the most serious worms in the last year have demonstrated that supposedly-isolated networks often have undocumented connections to the Internet, or can fall to a piece of malicious code inadvertently carried beyond the firewall on a laptop computer." In other words: the folk who write worms are smarter than we are.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107104560986674994?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107104560986674994'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107104560986674994'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107104560986674994' title='Worm Hits Diebold&apos;s Windows ATMs'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107104559398391100</id><published>2003-12-10T15:39:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-10T15:40:38.966+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Mob Moves In</title><content type='html'>You know if &lt;a href="http://www.accountancyage.com/News/1135797" target="_blank"&gt;AccountancyAge&lt;/a&gt; are reporting it, there's money involved. According to the bean-counters, organised crime is looking at how it can make money from spam and virus writing, which means attacks may become less common than now but more dangerous. Quoting Russian antivirus expert Eugene Kaspersky, the latest MiMail worms were the first in a new type of attack aimed at deriving financial profit from viruses and malware. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Recent MiMail variants collected and forwarded PayPal account details to the worms' creators. 'The business of the mafia is business, and there could be a lot of money to be made from malware and spamming. As they consolidate control, the business of hacking and virus writing they will squeeze out independents. Spam will be an early target,' he said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What's the interest for the mafia? Stealing commercial valuable secrets, bringing down networks for extortion, grabbing money from PayPal accounts.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107104559398391100?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107104559398391100'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107104559398391100'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107104559398391100' title='The Mob Moves In'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107098280433637388</id><published>2003-12-09T22:13:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T22:14:08.860+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Do You Know Anyone Who Buys From Spammers?</title><content type='html'>There's another campaign on the road: This time it's telling you not to buy anything advertised on spam. I don't know anyone who would do this kind of thing, but there you are. According to Mike Adams ("President &amp; CEO, &lt;a href="http://www.arialsoftware.com" target="_blank"&gt;Arial Software&lt;/a&gt;, LLC, Permission Email Pioneer and founder of the "Spam. Don't Buy It." public education campaign") says: "While Internet users are rightfully raising their voices and urging legislators to outlaw spam, few users examine their own contribution to the problem. It is true that the primary blame for spam falls on spammers, but it is equally true that spam wouldn't exist at all if Internet users stopped buying products offered by spammers."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.spamdontbuyit.org/slogan_art/SDBI_72dpi_small.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;His argument: "Every user's inbox is a reflection of what Internet users are buying through spam. No spammer sends emails in the interests of the public good: they do it for profit, and that profit is only generated when Internet users open spam, read spam, and buy from spam. To stop spam, we have to stop buying from spam. That's why I have created the &lt;a href="http://www.spamdontbuyit.org/" target="_blank"&gt;"Spam. Don't Buy It.&lt;/a&gt;" campaign, to help educate Internet users on their role in the ongoing spam problem."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actually, the website does have some interesting bits. I'm just not quite sure what a "Permission Email Pioneer" is.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107098280433637388?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107098280433637388'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107098280433637388'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107098280433637388' title='Do You Know Anyone Who Buys From Spammers?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107098173842175063</id><published>2003-12-09T21:55:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T21:56:22.280+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Spam Law Passed, Not Many Impressed</title><content type='html'>The U.S. Congress has passed the anti-spam bill, after the House voted to approve minor Senate amendments, &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/34413.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Register reports&lt;/a&gt;. Not everyone thinks it's a good idea. The Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing (CAN-SPAM) Act does more harm than good in the fight against spam, according to critics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill criminalises common spamming tactics, such as using false return address. But it overrides Californian laws which had allowed spam recipients to sue spammers. The bill requires online marketeers to act on requests to "opt out" of future emails, unlike European Union legislation which requires them to seek the permission of consumers first. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Can-Spam Act is expected to be signed into law by President Bush before the start of next year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107098173842175063?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107098173842175063'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107098173842175063'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107098173842175063' title='Spam Law Passed, Not Many Impressed'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107096750420447225</id><published>2003-12-09T17:58:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T17:59:08.700+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Anti-Spam Mail Service Aliencamel Adds Humps</title><content type='html'>One anti-spam service I tried a few months back was Melbourne-based &lt;a href="http://aliencamel.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Aliencamel&lt;/a&gt;, which I thought was good but not perfect, have just announced some new features which may make the product more competitive in a tight marketplace. Aliencamel works as a mix of different anti-spam and anti-virus elements designed to keep out the riff-raff so you only download what you want. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://aliencamel.com/img/pea115.png" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new version turns Aliencamel into a kind of email account in its own right, including the ability to preview email in a web browser before tagging it as spam or downloading via your normal email program, full webmail access to your mailbox, as well as disposable email addresses you can use to deal with suspect web sites and third parties you're not sure about. On top of that the service's Pending Email Advisory -- a sort of floating alert that lets you know of new email that is suspect without actually sending it to you -- changes to reduce frequency of advisory emails. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most important, I think, is the fact that Aliencamel are going to embrace Bayesian filters -- the simple method of assigning a probability of spamminess to emails by looking at the innards of the email (content, header, HTML code) and comparing it to other emails it has looked at. I adore Bayesian filters (I still use &lt;a href="http://popfile.sourceforge.net/" target="_blank"&gt;POPFile&lt;/a&gt;) so I think it's great that Aliencamel are moving in that direction. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Aliencamel, by the way, is an anagram of clean email. It took me months to get it.)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107096750420447225?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107096750420447225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107096750420447225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107096750420447225' title='Anti-Spam Mail Service Aliencamel Adds Humps'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107092969758982536</id><published>2003-12-09T07:28:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T07:29:01.246+07:00</updated><title type='text'>The Phone Of The Future?</title><content type='html'>What will the handphone of the future look like? Sony reckons it will combine the functions of a mobile phone with an easy interface for remote access to computer files, &lt;a href="http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Japan/EL06Dh01.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Asia Times reports&lt;/a&gt;.  Here's what &lt;a href="http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/010878.php" target="_blank"&gt;Gizmodo&lt;/a&gt; say it will look like: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.gizmodo.com/archives/images/sonyprototypecell.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The interface will allow users to virtually transfer picture, music and text files so they can be viewed from computers outside the home or office. The handset is smaller than a cellular phone and uses IP (Internet Protocol) for conversations. It also has the ability to interact with a PC via a wireless or infrared connection. (Somehow I doubt we're going to be using infrared in the future, but there you go.)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107092969758982536?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092969758982536'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092969758982536'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107092969758982536' title='The Phone Of The Future?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107092866305468487</id><published>2003-12-09T07:11:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T07:11:46.936+07:00</updated><title type='text'>What Will Keep The Wi-Fi Customer Satisfied?</title><content type='html'>&lt;a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/002646.html" target="_blank"&gt;Wi-Fi Networking News&lt;/a&gt; talks about hotspots, and how providers are having to fight to keep their customers in a competitive market. Hotspot operators who charge, they say, are going to have to offer something unique beside Internet access if they want to attract customers. "Higher bandwidth than business-DSL or T-1 may have to be part of it."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I guess so. Most Wi-Fi spots are mere loss-leaders, ways to get people into your establishment and keep them there. Folk who charge may have provide other services to go with it: nice work environments, free coffee, printers -- or else be in places where there's no competition, like &lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/test/2003/12/news_wifi_for_t.html" target="_blank"&gt;truckstops&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107092866305468487?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092866305468487'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092866305468487'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107092866305468487' title='What Will Keep The Wi-Fi Customer Satisfied?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107092864401503924</id><published>2003-12-09T07:10:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T07:11:27.903+07:00</updated><title type='text'>A Way To Marry Offline And Online Shopping?</title><content type='html'>Further to my &lt;a href="http://loosewire.typepad.com/test/2003/12/buying_online_a.html" target="_blank"&gt;post about the perils of offline browsing and online buying&lt;/a&gt;, here's a possible solution, from &lt;a href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/002644.html" target="_blank"&gt;Wi-Fi Networking News&lt;/a&gt;: Software that lets PDA users check out details and reviews of a book while in the bookstore. &lt;a href="http://www.smartworlds.com/trident.htm" target="_blank"&gt;SmartWorlds' free software&lt;/a&gt; lets PDA users (customers can borrow a PDA and scanner from staff) shop and learn more about books while they're in a bookstore: Users are connected to Amazon.com's site where they can read reviews of the book, check pricing, and see other books recommended by readers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.smartworlds.com/images/ishop.jpg" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's the neat bit: In Boston, where the service is in place, the Trident bookstore is considered an affiliate of Amazon so if users of this service later buy one of the books they browsed for on Amazon, Trident earns a commission. Whether other bookstores are brave enough to do this I'm not sure, but it's a possible answer to the problem outlined in the earlier post. The beauty of it is that the bookstores play to their strengths: a great, comfortable place to browse and hang out, and the unmistakable allure of allowing customers to have that book in their hands, right now. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107092864401503924?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092864401503924'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092864401503924'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107092864401503924' title='A Way To Marry Offline And Online Shopping?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107092706937553981</id><published>2003-12-09T06:44:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T06:45:12.950+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Buying Online And Its Impact</title><content type='html'>I usually agree with Mike of &lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031208/1116213.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;TechDirt&lt;/a&gt;, but the trend he points to here worries me: browsing for what you want to buy offline (i.e. in shops) and then buying online. All well and good if you're talking about big brick and big mortar department stores, megamalls etc, but what about the small corner store or bookshop? That kind of approach is just going to accelerate the destruction of the small vendor. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-5116515.html?tag=techdirt" target="_blank"&gt;CNET quotes&lt;/a&gt; a study that "while nearly half of those surveyed use the Internet to look for products and then buy them either in a store or through a catalog, 45 percent are buying online after researching gifts in stores and catalogs". If everyone did that, there would be no stores to do your research in. For sure, folk are not going to buy something that's much more expensive, but they should consider the longer term impact of where they buy. As a former bookseller, I know customers don't think that hard about what life would be like without a bookshop until it's too late to stop buying their fare at the big mall at the end of the street.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107092706937553981?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092706937553981'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092706937553981'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107092706937553981' title='Buying Online And Its Impact'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107092562386729071</id><published>2003-12-09T06:20:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-09T06:21:07.670+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Coke Gets Into The Online Music Game</title><content type='html'>It's kind of interesting how many players want to play the online music game. Coca cola, has just joined the fray, according to &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/34404.html" target="_blank"&gt;The Register&lt;/a&gt;, meaning there are now online music sites owned by Apple, Microsoft, Dell, HP, Napster, Pepsi, Coke and possibly Wal-Mart. &lt;a href="http://www.mycokemusic.com/indexflash.html" target="_blank"&gt;Coke&lt;/a&gt; will go live in the UK next year, promising over 250,000 songs from 8,500 artists at a cost of 99p each. The new service will be run in partnership with music distributor OD2 - Microsoft's European DRM supplier. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.coke.com/images/logo.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wonder how all this is going to pan out. All these sites use various kinds of Digital Rights Management -- DRM -- and formats -- MP3, WMA, etc -- which is going to make it hard for punters to use them on different gadgets (and even different desktop programs). Indeed, that's the point: As The Register rightly points out, these new players in the game aren't interested in getting into the music industry, they're interested in getting new customers to use their hardware, or, in the case of soft drink manufacturers, to buy their primary product.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107092562386729071?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092562386729071'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107092562386729071'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107092562386729071' title='Coke Gets Into The Online Music Game'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107088405464077475</id><published>2003-12-08T18:47:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-08T18:48:17.513+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Plaxo Gets Lax?</title><content type='html'>Sometimes things change, and it's hard to stay on top of them. &lt;a href="http://www.plaxo.com" target="_blank"&gt;Plaxo&lt;/a&gt; is supposed to help with this -- an Outlook plug-in (i.e. a little piece of software that attaches itself to Outlook) which will update your contacts with other Plaxo users you know, and vice versa. Nice idea, and on the whole they did a good job of executing it. But now things are changing in PlaxoLand, and I'm not sure I'm on top of them anymore. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.plaxo.com/images/access_icon.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are privacy issues: who exactly gets to see your data? And then there's the money issue: how is Plaxo going to make money out of it? These sort of things worry folk: &lt;a href="http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/AnchorDesk/4520-7297_16-5111563.html?tag=adts" target="_blank"&gt;David Coursey&lt;/a&gt;, a columnist like myself but with more readers, trashes Plaxo, as does &lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20031208/025234.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;Mike in his excellent TechDirt blog&lt;/a&gt;. Plaxo was fine when people you knew added themselves and shared their info, but what happens, as Mike points out, when complete strangers do it? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.plaxo.com/images/maintain_icon.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I started to get peeved when I noticed that insurance salesmen started adding their contacts to my Plaxo setup. Surely that couldn't happen? I thought folk needed permission to do that? I asked Plaxo about this a few weeks back and was told: "If you are a Plaxo user and someone sends you a Plaxo card, there is a link in the notification to add them to your address book. They are only added if you explicitly click on this link." But I'm not sure that's true.  I'm a journalist so I've got a lot of people in my address book I couldn't identify in a police line-up, but I'm pretty sure I didn't let some of this pondlife into my Outlook. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.plaxo.com/images/update_icon.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bottom line: Plaxo need to address this and other issues before folk believe them. Sure, &lt;a href="http://www.plaxo.com/about/releases/release-11-24-03" target="_blank"&gt;800,000 people are using it&lt;/a&gt; in over 200 countries (how many countries are there? I thought it wasn't much more than that) but they'll leave in droves if they feel their privacy is being compromised.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107088405464077475?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107088405464077475'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107088405464077475'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107088405464077475' title='Plaxo Gets Lax?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107087658266803433</id><published>2003-12-08T16:43:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-08T16:43:45.686+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Stop It Before It Starts</title><content type='html'>A program I've found highly useful of late is &lt;a href="http://www.windowsstartup.com" target="_blank"&gt;Windows Startup Inspector&lt;/a&gt;. It does something Windows XP should do, but doesn't: Allow you to decide what programs do and don't start when Windows does. It sounds dumb until you realise that most programs these days -- including a lot that should know better -- automatically load themselves, or bits of themselves, into memory when you boot up. It can seriously slow down your computer, and there's no straightforward way to fix the problem in Windows XP. It's a bit like the next door neighbour cadging a lift to work everyday without asking. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.windowsstartup.com/images/Title.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Startup Inspector lists all these annoying programs, and will even try to tell you more about them than merely their name, via an online database of some 3,400 known programs. I have disabled about half of the programs that have loaded themselves uninvited and it definitely helps, even when you've got lots of memory to play with. They hog memory, but they also take time to load. Even sneaky little programs like RealNetworks' Tkbell.exe (a silly little reminder program) will try to reload itself automatically into your start-up queue whenever you use the RealPlayer (my advice: don't use it if you can possibly help it.) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Windows Startup Inspector is Freeware. If you like it you can make a donation to the author, through PayPal. Or you can buy his laptop, which he seems to be selling on eBay. Hard times for software authors?&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107087658266803433?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107087658266803433'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107087658266803433'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107087658266803433' title='Stop It Before It Starts'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107085189162275353</id><published>2003-12-08T09:51:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-08T09:52:14.076+07:00</updated><title type='text'>2003, Year of the Spiral of Evil? Or Just The Start?</title><content type='html'>MessageLabs, who track this sort of thing, say that spam and viruses hit all time highs in 2003. Not surprising, but the figures are pretty shocking, revealing the symbiotic relationship between spam and viruses -- what I called in a recent WSJ/FEER column The Spiral Of Evil (no, it doesn't seem to have caught on). Here are the figures: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="center"&gt;Two-thirds of all spam coming from open proxies created by viruses &lt;br /&gt;Ratio of spam to email is 1 in 2.5 &amp;#8211; up 77 per cent in 12 months &lt;br /&gt;Ratio of virus to email now 1 in 33 &amp;#8211; up 84 per cent&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Basically, this means that virus writers are hijacking innocent computers and turning them into open proxies -- a sort of free sorting office for spam, churning it all and in the process hiding the original sender from anti-spammers. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here's the link: Highlights of 2003 include &lt;b&gt;Sobig.F &lt;/b&gt;breaking the world record in August to become the fastest spreading virus ever with one million copies stopped in a day by MessageLabs. MessageLabs also reckon that 66% of spam was coming from computers infected by viruses such as Sobig.F.  At its peak, 1 in every 17 emails stopped by MessageLabs contained a copy of the SoBig.F.  By December 1, more than 32 million emails containing the virus had been stopped by MessageLabs, putting Sobig.F at head of the Top 10 Viruses List for 2003.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107085189162275353?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107085189162275353'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107085189162275353'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107085189162275353' title='2003, Year of the Spiral of Evil? Or Just The Start?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107084091357072731</id><published>2003-12-08T06:48:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-08T06:49:15.950+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Kazaa Gets Tough --- On Copyright Infringement</title><content type='html'>The irony is not lost on those writing about it: Sharman Networks, owner of the music-swapping program Kazaa (a Napster imitatator) is closing down &lt;a href="http://kazaalite.tk/" target="_blank"&gt;Kazaalite K++&lt;/a&gt;, a version written by other folk that was designed to do what Kazaa does without all the spyware and adware. They complained about it infringing copyright, or something. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.kazaa.com/us/images/h_logo.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The irony continues: Although the main download site is down, users can apparently still obtain copies via the Kazaa network: In other words, use the Kazaa program to find the 'illegal' version of Kazaa to download music (illegally).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What strikes me is on the discussion sites (here's &lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30060" target="_blank"&gt;Metafilter&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/07/1540251" target="_blank"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;), you realise just how many other similar programs there are to Kazaa, or Kazaalite. I guess online music swapping in one form or another is going to continue as long as there are clever programmers out there. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107084091357072731?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107084091357072731'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107084091357072731'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107084091357072731' title='Kazaa Gets Tough --- On Copyright Infringement'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107079459431323916</id><published>2003-12-07T17:56:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-07T17:57:16.046+07:00</updated><title type='text'>More Readers Than You Can Poke A Blog At</title><content type='html'>I was looking for a new RSS Reader today -- RSS is a format that allows, usually, bloggers to have their blogs fed directly to interested subscribers in a format that's simple and accessible. Rather than visit the blog the reader just opens their email, or, more commonly, a special program called a Reader, and reads the updates from there. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.newzcrawler.com/images/nctitle.gif" border="0"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, there are a lot of readers out there. A lot. Even since the last time I looked a few months back. I won't recommend one, but you should check out &lt;a href="http://www.bradsoft.com/feeddemon/index.asp" target="_blank"&gt;FeedDemon&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.sharpreader.net/&gt;SharpReader&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.newzcrawler.com/" target="_blank"&gt;NewzCrawler&lt;/a&gt;. But there are dozens more: &lt;a href="http://www.activerefresh.com/abilon.php" target="_blank"&gt;Abilon&lt;/a&gt; looks cute, as does &lt;a href="http://www.rssnewsticker.com/" target="_blank"&gt;RSSNewsTicker&lt;/a&gt;, which is less of a reader and more of a ticker scrolling across your screen. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The creativity in the blogging and RSS field at the moment is extraordinary. Very impressive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107079459431323916?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107079459431323916'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107079459431323916'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107079459431323916' title='More Readers Than You Can Poke A Blog At'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107076167812406021</id><published>2003-12-07T08:47:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-07T08:48:39.593+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: DVD Burners, Going Even Cheaper</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Further to my column last week about how DVD burners may be worth investing   in, Slashdotters are debating their rapidly falling prices -- in some cases to   below $100. The discussion &lt;A   href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/06/1419252"&gt;is here&lt;/A&gt;; the   original &lt;A   href="http://www.hothardware.com/hh_files/Drives/aopen_drw4410.shtml"&gt;article   reviewing&lt;/A&gt; sub-$100 burners is here. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0   src="http://www.hothardware.com/reviews/images/aopen_drw4410/thumbs/boxfront.jpg"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Having just spent more of my weekend than is healthy backing up my MP3   collection (20+ gigabytes) I have no doubt about their appeal for storing large   quantities of data. That collection went onto six DVD discs. If I'd done the   same thing to CD-ROM it would have taken, er, a lot more. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107076167812406021?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107076167812406021'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107076167812406021'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_12_07_archive.html#107076167812406021' title='Update: DVD Burners, Going Even Cheaper'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107067054541346529</id><published>2003-12-06T07:29:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-06T07:29:46.216+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: The Anti Anti iPod Backlash</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny5.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;More on the Neistat Brothers and their &lt;A   href="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/archives/2003_11_30_loosewire_archive.html#107023894000228184"&gt;complaint&lt;/A&gt;   about an iPod battery. Seems there's something of a &lt;A   href="http://daringfireball.net/2003/12/alternative_stencils"&gt;backlash brewing   by folk&lt;/A&gt; who feel they didn't have much of a case. (beautiful website, that   one, by the way). &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Note to subscribers to the blog. For now I'm sending these updates directly   to you since there appears to be a problem with the Bloglet email handler.   Please reply &lt;A href="mailto: blogsub@jeremywagstaff.com"&gt;to me directly &lt;/A&gt;if   you don't want to receive the updates. I'll let you know when things are back to   normal. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107067054541346529?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107067054541346529'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107067054541346529'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107067054541346529' title='Update: The Anti Anti iPod Backlash'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107067028394372719</id><published>2003-12-06T07:24:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-06T07:25:24.700+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Yahoo Proposes A Way Out Of Spam</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;At last, someone is doing something about spam.   Part of the problem behind spam is that email allows sleazier folk to fake where   the email is coming from (the 'From' part of the email's address fields, or   header.) But if email didn't allow that, and authenticated a sender before   passing it on to the recipient, you might kill off spam in a second. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The problem has been implementing something like this. How do you get   everyone to agree on the new system? Yahoo, &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031205/tc_nm/tech_yahoo_dc"&gt;Reuters   reports&lt;/A&gt;, reckons it has the answer: architecture where sending an e-mail   message would embed a secure, private key in a message header. The receiving   system would check that against the sending domain's public key. If the public   key is able to decrypt the private key embedded in the message, then the e-mail   is considered authentic and can be delivered. If not, then the message is   assumed not to be an authentic one from the sender and is blocked. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Yahoo says it can make the system work even if only a few major email   providers adopt it. Given Yahoo's size in the email world that may not be so   hard. Yahoo is making the technology available for free, so that while it may   cost money to implement, it doesn't leave any one player with a proprietary   technology dominating the industry. (I guess spam costs Yahoo so much money it   has figured it's cheaper to give away a new system if it gets rid of spam.)   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;It'll be interesting to see how far this goes before another big player,   say Microsoft, tries to stomp on it. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107067028394372719?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107067028394372719'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107067028394372719'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107067028394372719' title='News: Yahoo Proposes A Way Out Of Spam'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107053134861740950</id><published>2003-12-04T16:49:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-04T16:49:47.623+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Note: Apologies to Subscribers of Loose Wire Blog</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Folks, my humble apologies to those of you who   haven't received your blog update for a while. One subscriber alerted me to the   problem and I believe I've fixed it. For those of you who haven't been receiving   anything for a few weeks, I won't bombard you with back-issues, but please visit   the site as, apart from a few days in October, it's been updated several times a   day. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;As usual, please feel free to email me with questions, suggestions, or   comments you want either included in the blog or in the letters page of the &lt;A   href="http://www.feer.com"&gt;Far Eastern Economic Review&lt;/A&gt;, Loose Wire's home.   And, if you don't get anything for a day or two, send me an &lt;A   href="mailto: blogmail@jeremywagstaff.com"&gt;email&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;For those of you who prefer it, there is an RSS feed available on the site.   It's the same as this, but as an RSS feed, obviously. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Thanks for reading. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107053134861740950?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107053134861740950'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107053134861740950'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107053134861740950' title='Note: Apologies to Subscribers of Loose Wire Blog'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107053074141192493</id><published>2003-12-04T16:39:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-04T16:39:40.373+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Wi-fi For Truckers</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Interesting piece from the &lt;A   href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/04/technology/circuits/04truc.html"&gt;New   York Times&lt;/A&gt; about Wi-fi for truckers.&amp;nbsp;Turns out they like Wi-fi because   it's spreading to truckstops and their "cabs are not only workplaces but often   sleeping quarters as well". &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Truck stops have offered various Internet options for years, but the   connections have often been slow and expensive, and required drivers to go   inside. In turn the connections, available by subscription for terms from 15   minutes to a year, provide a new source of revenue for the truck stops. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;What I like about this idea is that it expands the technology beyond its   traditional white-collar borders. Plus it would help make a really good sequel   to 'Convoy'. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107053074141192493?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107053074141192493'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107053074141192493'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107053074141192493' title='News: Wi-fi For Truckers'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107050248231241519</id><published>2003-12-04T08:48:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-04T08:48:40.860+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More RIAA Suits A-flying, More Lawyers A-leaping</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny6.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;The Recording Industry Association of America Inc   is not letting up. &lt;A   href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/12/03/HNriaalegal_1.html"&gt;IDG News   reports&lt;/A&gt; that the RIAA is firing off a new wave of lawsuits and   lawsuit-notification letters to users alleged to have illegally distributed   significant amounts of copyright-protected music files online. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The group is filing 41 new lawsuits and sending 90 lawsuit-notification   letters this week, adding to the 341 lawsuits filed and 308 notification letters   sent since September. The RIAA has settled with 220 file-sharers as a result of   lawsuits, lawsuit-notification letters and subpoenas. In addition, 1,054 users   have submitted affidavits as part of the RIAA's amnesty program. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The party is definitely over. But while clearly the RIAA doesn't worry too   much about the negative publicity from all this, I suspect they may be winning   the battle but not the war. Buying music online will not properly take off until   users know that the music they buy will be nor more restricted than the CDs they   buy in shops, as to where they can play, how long they play it, where they can   copy it to, and whether it's theirs to sell on to someone else. Until that   happens everything between now and then is an experiment. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107050248231241519?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107050248231241519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107050248231241519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107050248231241519' title='Update: More RIAA Suits A-flying, More Lawyers A-leaping'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107049759980885273</id><published>2003-12-04T07:26:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-04T07:27:18.576+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: Wendy, Greg and Mimail</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny18.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Got my first &lt;STRONG&gt;Mimail-L virus&lt;/STRONG&gt; email   this morning. The social engineering is excellent. The header looks credible,   the subject and address line plausible and the email itself is readable,   literate and, while pornographic, a compelling storyline. It also got past my   Bayesian spam filter which is unusual. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;My conclusion: this could be a nasty one. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107049759980885273?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107049759980885273'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107049759980885273'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107049759980885273' title='Update: Wendy, Greg and Mimail'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107043379158427912</id><published>2003-12-03T13:43:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-03T13:43:49.403+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: More Worms</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Watch out for Mimail.L. During 1st and 2nd December 2003, MessageLabs has   intercepted a number of copies of a further variant of the Mimail email worm -   W32/Mimail.L.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Here's what to watch out for: &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;The worm arrives as an attachment to an email with     the subject line Re[2]. The emails arrive from spoofed addresses, disguising     the true identity of the sender, such     as:&lt;BR&gt;billing.authorizenet.com&lt;BR&gt;billing.spamcop.net&lt;BR&gt;billing.carderplanet.net&lt;BR&gt;billing.cardcops.com&lt;BR&gt;billing.register.com&lt;BR&gt;billing.spews.org&lt;BR&gt;billing.spamhaus.org&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;The worm is self-propagating, and spreads by sending     itself to emails harvested from infected machines.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;Email characteristics&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;Subject line: Re[2]&lt;BR&gt;Possible message texts: &lt;BR&gt;Hi     Greg its Wendy. &lt;BR&gt;I was shocked, when I found out that it wasn't you but     your twin brother!!! That's amazing, you're as like as two peas. No one in bed     is better than you Greg. I remember, I remember everything very well, that     promised you to tell how it was, I'll give you a call today after 9.     &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;(remainder of text removed)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;-------------------------------&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;Good afternoon, We are going to bill your credit card     for amount of $22.95 on a weekly basis. Free pack of child porn CDs is already     on the way to your billing address. If you want to cancel membership and your     CD pack please email order and credit card details to..(list of email     addresses)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;(remainder of text removed)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;Attached file:   test.exe&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107043379158427912?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107043379158427912'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107043379158427912'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107043379158427912' title='News: More Worms'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107041096317887225</id><published>2003-12-03T07:22:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-03T07:23:21.106+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Squeeze More Out Of Your Gadget</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny13.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;If you're trying to get more out of your PDA,   phone, Treo or whatever, here's the blog for you: &lt;A   href="http://www.mobilewhack.com/"&gt;MobileWhack&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT color=#808000&gt;MobileWhack is a repository of hacks, hints, tips,     tools, stories, news, ideas, and wishes for and around the mobile device     you're actually using. The raisons d'etre are to be useful, to inspire, and to     delight.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;  &lt;DIV dir=ltr&gt;Actually there's some useful stuff in there. A post yesterday, for   example, explains how to use your Treo 600 as a wireless   modem.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107041096317887225?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107041096317887225'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107041096317887225'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107041096317887225' title='News: Squeeze More Out Of Your Gadget'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107041070167511564</id><published>2003-12-03T07:18:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-03T07:18:59.576+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: File Sharers Beware </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;File sharers beware: there's nowhere to hide, even   in supposedly 'anonymous' filesharing networks. The &lt;A   href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994436"&gt;NewScientist.com   news service&amp;nbsp;reports&lt;/A&gt; that&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Japanese police have arrested   two people&lt;/STRONG&gt; suspected of distributing pirated films and computer games   through a program called "Winny", which is meant to hide the identity of a user   from everyone else on the network. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;It is unclear how the two suspects were traced but their arrests have   raised concerns about the security of the Winny network. According to the   Japanese Association of Copyright for Computer Software around 250,000 regularly   use it to trade files. Interest in anonymous file sharing networks has grown   rapidly since the US music industry began taking legal action against individual   users as part of a controversial attempt to stamp out illicit online music   trading.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;This is the first time anyone has been arrested in relation to use of this   type of secretive trading network. The most popular file-sharing networks   provide little or no secrecy for users who can easily be traced through their   computer's internet protocol (IP) address.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107041070167511564?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107041070167511564'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107041070167511564'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107041070167511564' title='News: File Sharers Beware '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107035083249671332</id><published>2003-12-02T14:40:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T14:41:09.576+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: More Money Fighting Spam Than Making It? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;As I've suspected, there's more money made in protecting us from spam than   from spam itself. According to a report by Ferris Research quoted by &lt;A   href="http://www.securitypipeline.com/news/showArticle.jhtml%3Bjsessionid=4BQNNL3ATPWJQQSNDBCSKHQ?articleId=16401249"&gt;TechWeb   news&lt;/A&gt;, revenue for vendors selling anti-spam products will be approximately   $130 million in 2003 and soar 200% in 2004 to a whopping $360 million. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Revenue generated by spammers in 2003 will be roughly $130 million while   their profit during the year will range from $20 million to $30 million.   Peanuts. Small potatoes. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107035083249671332?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107035083249671332'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107035083249671332'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107035083249671332' title='News: More Money Fighting Spam Than Making It? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107033994036891241</id><published>2003-12-02T11:39:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T11:39:37.170+07:00</updated><title type='text'>mobile clogging</title><content type='html'>I read a lot about folk who blog from the road so i thought i'd try from my cellphone. This is it. I wish i had something to say but i don't.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107033994036891241?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107033994036891241'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107033994036891241'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107033994036891241' title='mobile clogging'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107032488354503626</id><published>2003-12-02T07:28:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T07:28:40.450+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: Diebold Confirms Dropping E-voting Suit</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Diebold, the electronic voting company and the   subject of a recent Loose Wire column, have confirmed that they've decided not   to sue folk who published leaked documents about the alleged security breaches   of electronic voting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;AP reports (no URL available yet) that&amp;nbsp;a Diebold spokesman promised in   a conference call Monday with U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel and attorneys   from the Electronic Frontier Foundation that it would not sue dozens of   students, computer scientists and ISP operators who received cease-and-desist   letters from August to October.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Diebold did not disclose specifics on why it had dropped its legal case,   but the decision is a major reversal of the company's previous strategy.   Ohio-based Diebold, which controls more than 50,000 touch-screen voting machines   nationwide, had threatened legal action against dozens of individuals who   refused to remove links to its stolen data. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107032488354503626?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032488354503626'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032488354503626'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107032488354503626' title='Update: Diebold Confirms Dropping E-voting Suit'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107032295538967950</id><published>2003-12-02T06:55:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T06:56:31.750+07:00</updated><title type='text'>View: Why Are Printers So Tricky? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny13.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;I've written before about &lt;STRONG&gt;how printer   manufacturers gouge us&lt;/STRONG&gt; by selling us cheap printers but expensive   cartridges. But either I'm missing something or these guys won't stop at   anything to make a bit more cash: I noticed for the first time yesterday that,   with my HP DeskJet 640c, if I change the settings to print from colour to black   (or vice versa) the software will automatically change my Draft output setting   to Normal -- meaning I'll use more ink. Where is the justification for that? I   can't think of any, but I bet I'm not the only one who only notices the change   after I've printed a page or two -- if then. Sleazy. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Remedy? Bypass the HP printer software entirely using something like &lt;A   href="http://www.fineprint.com"&gt;FinePrint&lt;/A&gt; -- it also helps you print more   onto less paper. Oh, and refill your cartridges using the wonderful &lt;A   href="http://www.inke.com.sg"&gt;Inke&lt;/A&gt;. Then the printer manufacturers end up   being the patsies, selling you a cheap printer but not making any money off you   with overpriced ink. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107032295538967950?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032295538967950'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032295538967950'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107032295538967950' title='View: Why Are Printers So Tricky? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107032216798141657</id><published>2003-12-02T06:42:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-02T06:43:24.700+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: New Windows Is Out. Sort Of</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny6.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Psst! Wanna buy the &lt;STRONG&gt;latest version of   Windows&lt;/STRONG&gt;, years before you're supposed to? Head off to Malaysia's Johor   Bahru, where CDs containing software Microsoft has code named "Longhorn" are on   sale for six ringgit ($1.58). &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031201/tc_nm/tech_microsoft_piracy_dc"&gt;Reuters   reports&lt;/A&gt; that the software is an early version of Longhorn demonstrated and   distributed at a conference for Microsoft programmers in Los Angeles in October,   according to Microsoft Corporate Attorney Jonathan Selvasegaram. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;"It's not a ready product," he said from Malaysia. "Even if it works for a   while, I think it's very risky," to install on a home computer, he said. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Actually, this happens all the time. I've seen early versions of new   Windows products all the way back to Windows 95 dotted around Asia. Most are a   nightmare to install, and I'd steer clear of them if I were you.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107032216798141657?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032216798141657'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107032216798141657'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107032216798141657' title='News: New Windows Is Out. Sort Of'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107023894000228184</id><published>2003-12-01T07:35:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-01T07:36:15.686+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More On iPods -- And Their Batteries</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Seems the guys -- the Neistat Brothers -- who were   complaining about not being to replace their &lt;STRONG&gt;iPod batteries&lt;/STRONG&gt;   without expensive customer support were wrong, and even the guy who hosted their   video &lt;A href="http://das.doit.wisc.edu/neistatsdirtysecret.txt"&gt;isn't   happy&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;As far as I can work out, the brothers &lt;A   href="http://www.ipodsdirtysecret.com/"&gt;posted a soundfile&lt;/A&gt; of an Apple   customer support guy saying they may as well replace their iPod since it would   be prohibitive to replace the battery. They then went around defacing iPod   posters. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The bottom line: you can replace the batteries, using either an &lt;A   href="http://depot.info.apple.com/ipod/"&gt;official Apple battery&lt;/A&gt; or a &lt;A   href="http://www.ipodbattery.com/"&gt;third-party one&lt;/A&gt;. Anyway, here's some more   discussion at &lt;A   href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/30/1824259"&gt;Slashdot&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A   href="http://www.plasticbag.org/archives/2003/11/on_the_guts_of_a_new_machine_part_one.shtml"&gt;plasticbag.org&lt;/A&gt;   on the iPod anniversary and the NYT's piece I mentioned in the previous posting.   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;(Sorry, don't usually crowd the links into one posting like this, but it   seems to make sense this time.) &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107023894000228184?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107023894000228184'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107023894000228184'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107023894000228184' title='Update: More On iPods -- And Their Batteries'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107023344581856589</id><published>2003-12-01T06:04:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-12-01T06:04:41.903+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: The History of the iPod</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Nice story by the &lt;A   href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/30/magazine/30IPOD.html?pagewanted=all&amp;amp;position="&gt;New   York Times' Rob Walker&lt;/A&gt; on the history of the iPod, two years old this month.   I have to say after initial skepticism I'm a convert, whisking it around with me   on forays to the jogging track, the pool, and the car. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG height=116 alt="" hspace=0   src="http://a772.g.akamai.net/7/772/51/a26b982942806d/www.apple.com/ipod/images/index_ipodindock10162003.jpg"   width=128 align=baseline border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;There&amp;nbsp;have, however, been rumblings of complaint about the battery:   One user says he was given short shrift by Apple when his died after 18 months,   being told it would be cheaper for him to buy a new iPod. I'm waiting for a   response from Apple on this one. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107023344581856589?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107023344581856589'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107023344581856589'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_30_archive.html#107023344581856589' title='News: The History of the iPod'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-107000677371075973</id><published>2003-11-28T15:06:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-28T15:06:47.186+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More On The Dutch Spam Wars</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny2.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Further to &lt;A   href="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/archives/2003_11_23_loosewire_archive.html#106971768135877442"&gt;my   post&lt;/A&gt; about the war between a spammer and three Dutch bloggers, I've heard   from one of the bloggers, &lt;A href="http://www.bastard-inc.com"&gt;Bas Taart&lt;/A&gt;:   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;I was one of the three bloggers that started the war on CustomerBlast     (The spammer), and for the record, I'd like to say that I never went offline     due to counterattacks. Customerblast.com however, seems to have seized to     exist.&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;I guess we won..&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;More on this in a future column. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-107000677371075973?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107000677371075973'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/107000677371075973'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#107000677371075973' title='Update: More On The Dutch Spam Wars'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106989108431696673</id><published>2003-11-27T06:58:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-27T06:58:35.716+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: Diebold Withdraws E-voting Suit?</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny1.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Further to my column about   &lt;STRONG&gt;e-voting&lt;/STRONG&gt; a few weeks back, Diebold, maker of electronic voting   machines, has apparently withdrawn its suit against an ISP and some individuals   for posting leaked company documents about some of the problems with their   system. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://www.diebold.com/images/logo2.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A   href="http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/about/cases/diebold_evoting.shtml#001766"&gt;Stanford   Law School reports&lt;/A&gt; that Diebold had filed papers with the court saying it   ?has decided not to take the additional step of suing for copyright infringement   for the materials at issue. Given the widespread availability of the stolen   materials, Diebold has further decided to withdraw its existing DMCA   notifications and not to issue any further ones for those materials.? &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;No mention of this yet on the Electronic Freedom Foundation's website   (which is funding legal protection for the ISP) or   Diebold's.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106989108431696673?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106989108431696673'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106989108431696673'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106989108431696673' title='Update: Diebold Withdraws E-voting Suit?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106989064934032153</id><published>2003-11-27T06:50:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-27T06:51:21.623+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Segway's First Hit And Run</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;A Segway rider in San Francisco hit a 3-year-old   girl while riding -- illegally -- on one of the city's sidewalks, &lt;A   href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/news/111903_nw_segway.html"&gt;ABC reports&lt;/A&gt;.   The man fled the scene (on his Segway). &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0   src="http://a.abclocal.go.com/images/kgo/kgo_111903_segway.jpg" align=baseline   border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The police says it expects to be able to quickly track down the suspect by   contacting Segway, and obtaining a list of San Francisco Segway owners.   Apparently there aren't that many. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106989064934032153?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106989064934032153'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106989064934032153'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106989064934032153' title='News: Segway&apos;s First Hit And Run'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106985908386531449</id><published>2003-11-26T22:04:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-26T22:05:15.623+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Google In A Mess? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;There's an interesting piece in Fortune,   apparently, on how Google is a company "in disarray". &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG height=55 alt="" hspace=0 src="http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif"   width=135 align=baseline border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/34197.html"&gt;The Register   reports&lt;/A&gt; that several big names have left because of "the juvenile company   culture": No one pays any attention at meetings, because they're fiddling with   their toys, reports &lt;A   href="http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,548765,00.html"&gt;Fortune&lt;/A&gt;.   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106985908386531449?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106985908386531449'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106985908386531449'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106985908386531449' title='News: Google In A Mess? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106985873991805956</id><published>2003-11-26T21:58:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-26T21:59:30.936+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: More Broadband For Cute Sounding Villages</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;I wrote a few weeks back in my column about how a   village in Northamptonshire, England, overcame the failure of the national   carrier, BT, to install broadband by building their own Wi-Fi network.   Neighbouring villages have taken a different route. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A   href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/northamptonshire/3238858.stm"&gt;The   BBC reports&lt;/A&gt; that Middleton Cheney, Byfield and some other Northants villages   will have access to a broadband service after residents were encouraged to sign   online and written petitions by the East Midlands Development Agency. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Other villages which will be able to access the faster connection (sorry,   but I love the names so I'm listing them here) are Hinton, Woodford Halse,   Charwelton, Upper and Lower Boddington, Chacombe, Wardington, Thorpe Mandeville,   Farthinghoe and Overthorpe. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106985873991805956?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106985873991805956'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106985873991805956'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106985873991805956' title='News: More Broadband For Cute Sounding Villages'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106980442437468007</id><published>2003-11-26T06:53:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-26T06:54:14.810+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More DRM Woes For Online Music</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Further to my previous post about DRM, or digital   rights management, here's a &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/mc/20031125/tc_mc/newcodefirststepinbreakingapplesdrm"&gt;story   from IDG News Service&lt;/A&gt; about software that may allow Windows-using customers   of Apple Computer Inc.'s iTunes Music Store to break the DRM technology that   protects files downloaded from that service. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;That the guy who posted it -- or hosted it -- is &lt;A   href="http://www.nanocrew.net/blog/"&gt;Jon Lech Johansen&lt;/A&gt;, also known as "DVD   Jon" is interesting. Johansen was arrested in Norway in 1999 after he created   software to crack the copy protection on DVDs, according to IDG. He was   acquitted on the grounds he was entitled to access information on a DVD that he   had purchased, and was therefore entitled to use his program to break the   code.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;This is, as IDG points out, at least the second time since its release on   October 16 that restrictions in iTunes for Windows have been circumvented by   developers. Bill Zeller's MyTunes application allows Windows users to download   music from an iTunes shared playlist over a network.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;IDG quotes an analyst saying this kind of thing won't necessarily be widely   used, due to the low cost of online music. But he does point out that it raises   costs for the likes of Apple. So why don't people go the route of &lt;A   href="http://www.emusic.com"&gt;Emusic&lt;/A&gt;, whose MP3 files are unencumbered by   DRM, meaning you can use them anywhere, anytime, and make any number of backups?   I use Emusic because the music now belongs to me, physically and absolutely.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106980442437468007?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980442437468007'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980442437468007'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106980442437468007' title='Update: More DRM Woes For Online Music'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106980381852913386</id><published>2003-11-26T06:43:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-26T06:44:09.123+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: The Future of Music and DRM</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny2.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;For those of you interested in the debate about   copyright protection for music (digital rights management, or DRM, as it's   called) here's an interesting &lt;A   href="http://www.reed-electronics.com/ednmag/index.asp?layout=article&amp;amp;articleid=CA326913&amp;amp;stt=000&amp;amp;pubdate=10%2F16%2F2003&amp;amp;rid=0&amp;amp;rme=0&amp;amp;cfd=1"&gt;article   from the industry point of view&lt;/A&gt; -- and a lively discussion on the lively &lt;A   href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/25/1821218"&gt;Slashdot forum&lt;/A&gt;   (some contributions are more, er, erudite than others). &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Something I think hasn't been thought through by either side on the debate   is that once a product ceases to be purely the property of the holder -- like a   CD -- then problems will occur. What happens if I want to sell the music I've   downloaded via an online service using DRM? What happens when I want to sell   software I've bought that uses an activation feature? In the old days I could   just sell my CDs, or CD-ROMs, out of the trunk of my car. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106980381852913386?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980381852913386'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980381852913386'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106980381852913386' title='News: The Future of Music and DRM'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106980347053577398</id><published>2003-11-26T06:37:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-26T06:38:21.200+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Plea: Anyone Hit By Brand-Spoofing? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;If anyone has been hit by the recent wave of 'brand-spoofing' spam or   viruses -- particularly those that appear to be from a bank, or from Paypal or   eBay -- could they please drop me a line? I'm very interested in following up on   some of these cases for a future column. Reach me &lt;A   href="mailto:spoof(at)jeremywagstaff.com (replace the (at) with an @)"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.   Anonymity preserved if you'd prefer it. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106980347053577398?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980347053577398'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106980347053577398'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106980347053577398' title='Plea: Anyone Hit By Brand-Spoofing? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106971828794871632</id><published>2003-11-25T06:58:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-25T06:58:37.356+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Blogging For Politicians, Iranian Style</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;If you need convincing that blogging is not some   nerdy fringe activity, here's some: Iranian vice-president &lt;A   href="http://www.webnevesht.com/weblog/"&gt;Mohammad Ali Abtahi&lt;/A&gt; is a blogger.   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0   src="http://www.webnevesht.com/images/abt_abtahi_pr.jpg" align=baseline   border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;It's in Persian, &lt;A href="http://iranfilter.com/link.php/149"&gt;iranFilter (a   collective news blog) says&lt;/A&gt;, and is the first blog by a major Iranian   politician. It's personal rather than political, but has some nice surprises,   such as secret photos of Eduard Shevardnadze, and accounts of personal and   unofficial conversations with government ministers.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106971828794871632?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106971828794871632'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106971828794871632'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106971828794871632' title='News: Blogging For Politicians, Iranian Style'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106971768135877442</id><published>2003-11-25T06:48:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-25T06:48:30.903+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Spam Warfare, Dutch Style</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;If you wonder why people don't just go after spammers, vigilante-style,   here's why. Three Dutch blogging websites launched an online war against a U.S.   spammer, &lt;A href="http://www.customerblast.com"&gt;Customerblast.com&lt;/A&gt; late last   week, and found they'd bitten off more than they could chew. The weblogs,   according to The Register, tried to push Customerblast off the web with   sustained distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks (basically trying to   overload their system with requests for data). &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Customerblast fought back. On Friday, all three weblogs were inundated with   mail bombs, floods and DDOS attacks, forcing them to go offline temporarily.   Late Friday afternoon, the weblogs began a second attack. By Monday the spammer   had still not recuperated from the attacks. But there's been a downside. One of   the Dutch attackers says he was cut off by his Internet Service Provider and now   faces ?legal action?. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106971768135877442?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106971768135877442'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106971768135877442'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106971768135877442' title='News: Spam Warfare, Dutch Style'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106965234545616725</id><published>2003-11-24T12:39:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-24T12:39:34.496+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More Office Woes</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;My &lt;A   href="http://www.feer.com/cgi-bin/prog/getpage.cgi?column=Loose_Wire"&gt;latest   column&lt;/A&gt; (subscription only; very sorry) was about Microsoft Office 2003 and   how, despite all the upgrades, a lot of old bugs never get fixed. That and why   does every new feature appear to be more of&amp;nbsp;a money spinning operation than   a time saver? &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Anyway, I'm not the only grumbler: Chris Pirillo, of Lockergnome fame, is   also &lt;A href="http://chris.pirillo.com/archives/2003_11.html#008025"&gt;having   problems&lt;/A&gt;, with Outlook 2003. "If you rely on POP3 or IMAP, you'll be just as   disappointed with the lame UI bugs and inconsistencies that plague Microsoft's   latest client". &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106965234545616725?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106965234545616725'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106965234545616725'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_23_archive.html#106965234545616725' title='Update: More Office Woes'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106937114497972596</id><published>2003-11-21T06:32:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T06:32:50.733+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Computers Are Not Helping</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny12.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;More grim reports about how &lt;STRONG&gt;computers   aren't doing what they're supposed to&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;A   href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3283535.stm"&gt;BBC quotes new   research&lt;/A&gt; that says computer systems at work are not working as they should,   mainly because workers do not have enough guidance about technology, support   staff are cut off from other staff and managers are "naive". &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The problem is there is a built-in negativity about technology. When it   works well, it becomes invisible, but people only notice it when it goes wrong.   In the end, technology seems to create more work than it saves. Hear, hear.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106937114497972596?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937114497972596'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937114497972596'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106937114497972596' title='News: Computers Are Not Helping'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106937028892773128</id><published>2003-11-21T06:18:00.001+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T06:18:34.936+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Internet Gets Older, So To Speak</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;The old 'uns are getting online. &lt;A   href="http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_031120.pdf"&gt;Nielsen//NetRatings   reports&lt;/A&gt; (PDF file) that senior citizens age 65 and older were the fastest   growing age group online, surging 25 percent year over year in October 2003.   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Nielsen//NetRatings also found that in addition to outpacing senior males   in audience growth, the rise in usage by female seniors was greater than the   increase in usage by senior males, if you get my drift. "As a whole, the   Internet audience is continuing to become more representative of the general   population," said Greg Bloom, senior Internet analyst, Nielsen//NetRatings.   &lt;BR&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106937028892773128?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937028892773128'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937028892773128'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106937028892773128' title='News: Internet Gets Older, So To Speak'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106937028881698130</id><published>2003-11-21T06:18:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-21T06:18:34.763+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Ask Not For Whom The Cellphone Rings</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny12.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sounds like an episode from &lt;STRONG&gt;Six Feet   Under&lt;/STRONG&gt;: the family of a deceased motorcyclist are suing a funeral   firm&amp;nbsp;after the dead man's cell phone started ringing - from inside the   coffin.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;A Belgian newspaper, Gazet van Antwerpen, is reporting that the night   before the funeral the family gathered at the undertakers for a final private   farewell when they heard ringing from within the sealed coffin. Several   distressed members of the family had to leave the funeral home whilst staff   rushed to remove the cell phone.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The family is now suing, according to &lt;A   href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/10149.shtml"&gt;Cellular News&lt;/A&gt;,   claiming that the undertakers were negligent in preparing their relative for   burial. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106937028881698130?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937028881698130'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106937028881698130'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106937028881698130' title='News: Ask Not For Whom The Cellphone Rings'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106924425331447457</id><published>2003-11-19T19:17:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-19T19:17:57.890+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More On Those Exploding Phones</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny2.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Just when you thought it was over.... &lt;A   href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/68/34069.html"&gt;The Register   reports&lt;/A&gt; that Test-Aankoop, the Belgian consumer watchdog that reported Nokia   batteries as dangerous and then had it &lt;A   href="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/archives/2003_11_16_loosewire_archive.html#106916437410961256"&gt;corrected&lt;/A&gt;,   says Nokia still has a problem. The Finnish mobile phone maker cannot guarantee   that its batteries are safe, because consumers cannot distinguish between   original and non-original batteries, the watch dog says. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Nokia yesterday admitted that "tens of thousands counterfeit batteries were   seized in recent raids in Holland, the United Kingdom, and other countries in   the EU". &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Reminds me of the fake Bluetooth story a while back. How do we know what's   kosher and that it won't blow up in our face, or ear? &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106924425331447457?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106924425331447457'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106924425331447457'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106924425331447457' title='Update: More On Those Exploding Phones'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106919981231943423</id><published>2003-11-19T06:56:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-19T06:57:15.796+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Microsoft Takes on Google's Customisable News</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Microsoft is taking on Google,&lt;/STRONG&gt; at   least in its news. &lt;A   href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994398"&gt;The New Scientist   says&lt;/A&gt; Microsoft is testing a a news-gathering web site that tailors the   stories selected to individual users. Once MSN Newsbot is fully functional,   Microsoft says the site will personalise results within 10 minutes of a user   starting to browse. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Microsoft is not revealing exactly how its site will work. But experts say   there are several possible types of algorithm that could be used. One is similar   to those Amazon.com uses to recommend additional books a buyer might like. This   algorithm analyses the other choices of people who have already bought the first   book. A news site would instead group articles according to the reading patterns   of previous users.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106919981231943423?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919981231943423'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919981231943423'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106919981231943423' title='News: Microsoft Takes on Google&apos;s Customisable News'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106919966817972649</id><published>2003-11-19T06:54:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-19T06:54:51.653+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: More on Cellphone Dangers</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny7.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Here's more on the &lt;STRONG&gt;dangers of   cellphones&lt;/STRONG&gt;: the &lt;A   href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3279809.stm"&gt;BBC reports&lt;/A&gt; that people   who chat on their mobile phone while walking could be hurting their back,   according to scientists at Australia's University of Queensland. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;They say the human body is designed to exhale when our feet touch the   ground. This helps to protect the spine from sudden jolts. However, talking and   walking at the same time disrupts this breathing pattern, leaving the spine   exposed. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Of course, this has implications beyond cellphones. Seems that a lot of us   walk and talk at the same time, with the possible exception of Gerald Ford.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106919966817972649?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919966817972649'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919966817972649'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106919966817972649' title='News: More on Cellphone Dangers'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106919898701192888</id><published>2003-11-19T06:43:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-19T06:43:30.640+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: How Healthy Are Cellphones? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny12.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Good article on the &lt;STRONG&gt;health effects of   using cellphones&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;A   href="http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/southflorida/sfl-rxfone16nov16,0,7861249.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines"&gt;The   Sun Sentinel says&lt;/A&gt; the U.S. is preparing to launch an investigation into the   matter, and quotes Gary Brown, an adjunct professor in technologies at Nova   Southeastern University, as saying people don't realize the issue of cell phone   safety has not been settled. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;"The industry says there's no problem and the public remains ignorant.   Adults can do what they want, but where the issue becomes critical, is with   children," Brown said.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106919898701192888?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919898701192888'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106919898701192888'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106919898701192888' title='News: How Healthy Are Cellphones? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106916482843128446</id><published>2003-11-18T21:13:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-18T21:14:12.106+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Shredded Stasi Documents To Be Pieced Back Together</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;The kind of story I love: technology used to bring   the oppressor to book. &lt;A   href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/63/34041.html"&gt;The Register   reports&lt;/A&gt; that documents of the East German State Security Service (Stasi),   torn into shreds and stored in 16,000 brown sacks, may soon be pieced together   by a software program developed by the Fraunhofer Institute. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;On Monday, the Institute said it would take five years to solve the world's   biggest jigsaw puzzle electronically. If done by hand, the operation would take   several hundred years. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106916482843128446?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106916482843128446'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106916482843128446'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106916482843128446' title='News: Shredded Stasi Documents To Be Pieced Back Together'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106916437410961256</id><published>2003-11-18T21:06:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-18T21:06:37.873+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: Nokia Batteries Safe Shock</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Nokia, hit by a recent spate of reports, from   Vietnam to the Netherlands, of its batteries overheating and catching fire or   exploding, says a follow-up test by a Belgian consumer watchdog had shown its   own-made batteries were safe for use, &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031118/tc_nm/tech_nokia_batteries_dc"&gt;Reuters   reports&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Nokia said in a statement a new test by Test-Aankoop, conducted on November   17, showed all Nokia-made batteries were protected against short-circuiting,   believed to be the cause of the problems. The Belgian firm said in a separate   statement its previous test released earlier this month had accidentally   included counterfeit batteries in the sample. But it said Nokia should address   the issue of many forged batteries sold under Nokia's brand.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106916437410961256?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106916437410961256'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106916437410961256'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106916437410961256' title='Update: Nokia Batteries Safe Shock'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106908330745489153</id><published>2003-11-17T22:35:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-17T22:35:29.920+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Security Dangers of Bluetooth</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny18.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;A potential loophole in security for Bluetooth   phones, which could see strangers hacking into your address books, has been   uncovered. &lt;A href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3276315.stm"&gt;BBC   reports&lt;/A&gt; that researchers have managed to steal information including address   books and images from handsets by exploiting shortcomings in Bluetooth security.   &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Adam Laurie of security firm AL Digital has created programs that run on a   laptop which scan for Bluetooth handsets and exploit two vulnerabilities to suck   down data from phones. This vulnerability has been found on the SonyEricsson   T68i and T610 phones and the Nokia 6310 and 7650 handsets. He calls it &lt;A   href="http://www.bluestumbler.org/"&gt;bluestumbling&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106908330745489153?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106908330745489153'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106908330745489153'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106908330745489153' title='News: Security Dangers of Bluetooth'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106908299764422570</id><published>2003-11-17T22:29:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-17T22:30:20.280+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Microsoft Takes Aim At Junk, Document Search</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny7.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Microsoft's Bill Gates has announced new junk   e-mail filtering technology called SmartScreen. &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/ap/20031117/ap_on_hi_te/comdex_gates"&gt;AP   reports&lt;/A&gt; the technology will use algorithms to judge whether incoming e-mail   messages qualify as junk e-mail and filter them out before they get to the end   user's e-mailbox. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;More interesting, Gates demonstrated Microsoft Research's &lt;STRONG&gt;Stuff   I've Seen &lt;/STRONG&gt;project, which is developing a tool for rapidly finding   material that users have seen ? whether it was an e-mail, Web site or document.   The tool is not to be incorporated in any products anytime soon, but shows   people some of where Microsoft's billions of dollars in research is   going.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106908299764422570?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106908299764422570'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106908299764422570'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106908299764422570' title='News: Microsoft Takes Aim At Junk, Document Search'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106902299133718112</id><published>2003-11-17T05:49:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-17T05:50:12.920+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: CNET Buys MP3.com from Vivendi</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;More &lt;STRONG&gt;music download site musical   chairs&lt;/STRONG&gt;: CNET Networks will buy MP3.com, one of the first online music   services, from Vivendi Universal Net USA. &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/ap/20031115/ap_en_bu/mp3com"&gt;AP   reports&lt;/A&gt; that&amp;nbsp;CNET, an online magazine/download site, will launch new   digital music service launching next year. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Vivendi acquired MP3.com in May 2001 in a $372 million cash-and-stock deal.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106902299133718112?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106902299133718112'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106902299133718112'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106902299133718112' title='News: CNET Buys MP3.com from Vivendi'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106894029420887503</id><published>2003-11-16T06:51:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-16T06:51:54.840+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More On E-Voting</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny12.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Further to my recent column on   &lt;STRONG&gt;e-voting&lt;/STRONG&gt; in FEER and WSJ.com (my apologies; available on   subscription only), the story continues. Avi Rubin, the Johns Hopkins University   computer scientist who identified security lapses in the voting system Maryland   is adopting appeared before state legislators in testimony that illustrates the   issues involved, and entrenched positions of those trying to defend weak voting   software. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;A   href="http://www.sunspot.net/news/local/bal-voting1114,0,1157686.story"&gt;The   Baltimore Sun carries a report&lt;/A&gt; of the meeting. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106894029420887503?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106894029420887503'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106894029420887503'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_16_archive.html#106894029420887503' title='Update: More On E-Voting'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106877787903170423</id><published>2003-11-14T09:44:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-14T09:44:57.983+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Software turns iTunes Into MP3 Downloader</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny8.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sometimes I wonder &lt;STRONG&gt;whether it's ever going   to be possible to produce a watertight way of limiting access to digital   music&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Take Apple's very popular iTunes, for example. &lt;A   href="http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-5107196.html?tag=nefd_top"&gt;CNET   reports&lt;/A&gt; that an independent software developer has created a program that   lets users of iTunes for Windows grab song files from other people on a computer   network, using a streaming feature already available in iTunes. The &lt;A   href="http://www.drunkenaardvark.com/"&gt;MyTunes&lt;/A&gt; software fits neatly into   iTunes and, unlike Apple's software which makes no permanent copy of the song,   captures that "stream" of music, making a copy that can be burned to a CD,   uploaded to the Net or streamed to another PC. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;As CNET says, "while stream recording is not new--a myriad programs exist   for recording Web radio and other streaming Net services for Windows and   Macintosh computers--the ease with which the MyTunes software fits into iTunes   pushes the experience to a new, and perhaps legally risky, level. Running the   program makes creating your own MP3 songs from someone else's collection as easy   or easier than grabbing MP3s via traditional file-swapping software like Kazaa.   That could complicate things for Apple, which depends on the music industry's   support--and indeed, has won unprecedented kudos from labels and artists--for   its iTunes music store." &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106877787903170423?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106877787903170423'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106877787903170423'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106877787903170423' title='News: Software turns iTunes Into MP3 Downloader'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106877234013607894</id><published>2003-11-14T08:12:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-14T08:12:39.420+07:00</updated><title type='text'>Update: More On Those Exploding Batteries</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Seems that &lt;STRONG&gt;Nokia may have been   right&lt;/STRONG&gt; about those exploding batteries being fakes. &lt;A   href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/68/33980.html"&gt;The Register&lt;/A&gt;   reports that the Belgian consumer organisation which last week claimed that   three Nokia batteries were unprotected against short-circuiting is to re-examine   its findings. It seems that Test-Aankoop may well have been hoodwinked and   tested fake Nokia batteries instead of the real thing. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Test-Aankoop is to test a new batch - this time using genuine Nokia   batteries. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106877234013607894?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106877234013607894'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106877234013607894'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106877234013607894' title='Update: More On Those Exploding Batteries'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106865047047102085</id><published>2003-11-12T22:21:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T22:21:07.790+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Nokia Confirms N-Gage Cracked</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny7.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Nokia has confirmed a story doing the rounds   yesterday: that hackers have cracked the copy-protection codes for its newly   launched N-Gage gaming device, allowing copied games to be downloaded over the   Web, &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031112/tc_nm/tech_nokia_ngage_dc"&gt;according   to Reuters&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0   src="http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/20031112/amdf404683.jpg"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Nokia has high hopes for N-Gage, aiming to challenge market leader   Nintendo's Gameboy Advance. A vital part of the revenue from N-Gage will come   from games, which are sold separately, but Nokia said it did not expect the   illegal downloads to become widespread. The cracked versions of the games can in   principle be installed and played on any phone that uses the same basic   operating software, Series 60, used in N-Gage. Other models include Siemens's   SX1.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106865047047102085?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106865047047102085'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106865047047102085'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106865047047102085' title='News: Nokia Confirms N-Gage Cracked'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106865029131291482</id><published>2003-11-12T22:18:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T22:18:08.746+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: The Explanation Behind All Those Attacks?</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny18.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;It seems that there's a purpose behind the viruses   we've all been getting: &lt;STRONG&gt;old-fashioned extortion&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031112/wr_nm/crime_internet_blackmail_dc"&gt;Reuters   reports&lt;/A&gt; that extortionists -- many thought to come from eastern Europe --   have been targetting casinos and retailers, but one recent high-profile victim   was the Port of Houston. The attacks, which can cripple a corporate network with   a barrage of bogus data requests, are followed by a demand for money. An   effective attack can knock a Web site offline for extended periods. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Online casinos appear to be a favorite target as they do brisk business and   many are located in the Caribbean where investigators are poorly equipped to   tackle such investigations. Police said because of a lack of information from   victimized companies, they are unsure whether these are isolated incidents or   the start of a new crime wave. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Last week, the online payment service WorldPay admitted to suffering a   major DDoS attack that lasted three days. WorldPay, owned by the Royal Bank of   Scotland, has been fully restored.&amp;nbsp;The NHTCU spokeswoman said the   investigation into the WorldPay is ongoing.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106865029131291482?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106865029131291482'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106865029131291482'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106865029131291482' title='News: The Explanation Behind All Those Attacks?'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106862262989380293</id><published>2003-11-12T14:37:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T14:37:07.053+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: More Banking Scam Trojan Spam</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny18.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;There's more spam-trojan-banking scams around:   these are emails that look like legit communications from your bank manager.   Australia is the probably source of a new one discovered in the last 24 hours,   according to MessageLabs, which at least looks plausible because it says your   credit application has been rejected. (I know the feeling.) &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;If activated (in other words, if you click on the attachment) the trojan   will try to download a further component from a free hosting website located in   Russia.&amp;nbsp; After activation, this trojan copies itself to the Windows System   folder and installs a .DLL file, which enables the trojan to acts as a proxy   server; i.e. it allows someone to channel any Internet activities through the   infected computer without the recipient's knowledge.&amp;nbsp;Non of this is   unusual, but I am not sure about this bit: the channel between the remote   computer -- the Russian one -- and the infected computer is also encrypted.   Sneaky. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;Here's an example of what it looks like: &lt;BR&gt;From: "Account Manager"     &amp;lt;&lt;A     href="mailto:accounts_manager@citibank.com"&gt;accounts_manager@citibank.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;Subject:     Re: Your credit application&lt;BR&gt;Text:&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Dear     Sir!&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Thank you for your online application for a Home     Equity Loan.&amp;nbsp;In order to be approved for any loan application we pull     your&amp;nbsp;Credit Profile and Chexsystems information, which didn't     satisfy&amp;nbsp;our minimum needs. Consequently, we regret to say that we     cannot&amp;nbsp;approve you for Home Equity Loan at this time.&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;*Attached are copy of your Credit Profile and Your Application     that&amp;nbsp;you submitted with us. Please take a close look at it, you will     receive&lt;BR&gt;hard copy by mail withing [sic] next few days.&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;    &lt;DIV&gt;Attachment:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A     href="http://www.citybankhomeloan.htm.pif"&gt;www.citybankhomeloan.htm.pif&lt;/A&gt;     (6,176 bytes)&amp;nbsp; [NB: spelling of citybank vs. citibank] &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;You've been warned. &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106862262989380293?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106862262989380293'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106862262989380293'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106862262989380293' title='News: More Banking Scam Trojan Spam'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106859247124791964</id><published>2003-11-12T06:14:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T06:14:28.766+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Say Goodbye To Popups</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny5.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Pop Up ads are doomed&lt;/STRONG&gt;, now that   Microsoft will make blocking them part of its browser, Internet Explorer.   Explorer, &lt;A href="http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104_2-5105139.html"&gt;ZDNet   says&lt;/A&gt;, joins other web browsers by doing it, but because of its huge market   share, it's likely to kill off the concept entirely. No bad thing, you may say,   but it will also hit advertising revenues and may kill off more than a few   ventures that depend on ads. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The moves by Microsoft and others are the result of deep consumer loathing   of pop-ups. About 88 percent of broadband users and 87 percent of dial-up users   in North America find that pop-ups interfere with their Web surfing experience,   according to Forrester Research.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106859247124791964?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859247124791964'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859247124791964'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106859247124791964' title='News: Say Goodbye To Popups'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106859207211320512</id><published>2003-11-12T06:07:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T06:07:49.740+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Trademarks, Slaps In The Face and McJobs</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny2.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;An interesting tale that is not that   technology-oriented, but illustrates how &lt;STRONG&gt;stories now tend to unfold in   real time&lt;/STRONG&gt;, in front of everyone, leaving less and less wiggle-room for   companies and institutions involved. Merriam-Webster, &lt;A   href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/33926.html"&gt;The Register says&lt;/A&gt;,   is revising a web page for its online Collegiate Dictionary after a McDonalds   executive complained about the inclusion of the word 'McJob'. The publisher,   however, insists that the two events are not related, and says the word remained   in the dictionary and would be restored online.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106859207211320512?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859207211320512'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859207211320512'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106859207211320512' title='News: Trademarks, Slaps In The Face and McJobs'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106859199785472519</id><published>2003-11-12T06:06:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T06:06:35.476+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Is Wi-Fi A Health Threat? </title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny9.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;An Illinois lawsuit against a school district is   bringing attention to the &lt;STRONG&gt;possible health effects of wireless   networks&lt;/STRONG&gt;. &lt;A href="http://wifinetnews.com/archives/002496.html"&gt;Wi-Fi   Networking News&lt;/A&gt; takes a closer look at concludes that while a study used by   the parents in the case "should certainly disturb those in the cell industry,   it?s applicability to Wi-Fi is very very low."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106859199785472519?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859199785472519'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859199785472519'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106859199785472519' title='News: Is Wi-Fi A Health Threat? '/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106859169257157384</id><published>2003-11-12T06:01:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-12T06:01:30.260+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Microsoft Turns Its Guns On Blogging, RSS Etc</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny16.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Unsurprisingly, perhaps, &lt;STRONG&gt;Microsoft have   got their eye on blogs&lt;/STRONG&gt;, RSS feeds and all those things that we love   down here at Loose Wire. &lt;A   href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,0,1378866,00.asp?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535"&gt;Microsoft   Watch reports&lt;/A&gt; a prototype of software code-named "Wallop" -- the company's   foray into social-networking software. While part of the application is a   blogging tool, it also includes Sapphire, technology for simplifying and   unifying data storage/retrieval; Stacks, technology for organizing photos;   Personal Map, technology for organizing contacts; and MS Connect and   Point-to-Point, which show connections between people (via Active Directory), as   well as between individuals and groups.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106859169257157384?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859169257157384'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106859169257157384'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106859169257157384' title='News: Microsoft Turns Its Guns On Blogging, RSS Etc'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106851759326414247</id><published>2003-11-11T09:26:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-11T09:26:30.740+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Another Shot In Foot For Apple</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny12.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;It never rains but it pours for Apple. Its stuff   seems to be selling well, but it still seems to run into trouble. Britain's TV   standards authority the Independent Television Commission &lt;A   href="http://www.itc.org.uk/itc_publications/complaints_reports/advertising_complaints/show_complaint.asp?ad_complaint_id=930"&gt;has   banned&lt;/A&gt; an ad for the the PowerMac G5 which claims it was "the world's   fastest, most powerful personal computer". Viewers (well, eight of them) said it   was misleading because the main claim was based on the results of limited tests   in which the specification of the computers used was configured to give Apple   the best results.&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;An expert looked into it and agreed: He found that the claim was not   supported by independent reviews and that at best "the G5 was generally as fast   as the best Intel-based workstations currently available". Judgement: the   advertising was misleading and required that it should not be re-shown in its   current form. Discussion on &lt;A   href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/10/2047209"&gt;Slashdot here&lt;/A&gt;.   &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106851759326414247?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106851759326414247'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106851759326414247'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106851759326414247' title='News: Another Shot In Foot For Apple'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-821018.post-106851753332580933</id><published>2003-11-11T09:25:00.000+07:00</published><updated>2003-11-11T09:29:48.926+07:00</updated><title type='text'>News: Sony (Nearly) Gets It</title><content type='html'>&lt;HEAD&gt;  &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;  &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;  &lt;BODY text=#000000 bgColor=#ffffff&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" hspace=0 src="http://loosewire.blogspot.com/tiny7.gif"   align=baseline border=0&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sony is taking the route I (and I'm sure, hundreds   of others) have been pushing for: &lt;STRONG&gt;offer the consumer a reward, or   compensation, for going legit&lt;/STRONG&gt;. But they still don't get it right. &lt;A   href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&amp;amp;u=/nm/20031110/tc_nm/media_sonymusic_dc"&gt;Reuters   reports&lt;/A&gt; that Sony Music will introduce new CD technology in Germany that   prevents users from copying songs to file-sharing sites, but allows them to make   copies for their personal use. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;The important&amp;nbsp;bit is the extras they offer on the CD: Naturally   Seven's new German CD will have a "second session." The disc can be played on   almost any device conventionally, and also contains a compressed digital copy of   the music that can be quickly copied onto any computer. The CDs also allow users   to connect to Web sites with exclusive features such as bonus songs and concert   tickets. The features are only available if you have the original CD. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Sadly, however, Sony still don't get it, thinking we all live in a world   that looks like a Sony ad: The digital files will only play on Sony-licensed   digital music players. And to copy the music to the Sony portable player, the   technology requires an extra step to copy the files to a separate program to   transfer the music to the portable player. &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;When will they learn? &lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;  &lt;DIV&gt;Somewhat bizarrely,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;the piece quotes Sony Music Chief Technology   Officer Phil Wiser as saying, "All copy-protections can be hacked.&amp;nbsp;But if   give people what they are asking for in terms of value, they won't go out and   steal it. It's called trusting the consumer."&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;p&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/821018-106851753332580933?l=loosewire.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106851753332580933'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/821018/posts/default/106851753332580933'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://loosewire.blogspot.com/2003_11_09_archive.html#106851753332580933' title='News: Sony (Nearly) Gets It'/><author><name>Jeremy</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/04355531958387035106</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author></entry></feed>
